Cited by 158Wound Healing and TreatmentsFlavonoids in Medical ResearchBee Products Chemical Analysis

Wound Healing Effect of Kaempferol in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Rats

Özay, Yusuf, Güzel, Sevda, Yumrutaş, Önder, Pehlivanoğlu, Burçin, Erdoğdu, İbrahim Halil, Yildirim, Zuhal, Türk, Bilge Aydın, Darcan, Sinan·2019·Journal of Surgical Research

Abstract

Background Flavonoids have previously been suggested to play a role in wound healing. To date, however, limited information is available on the wound healing effect of kaempferol (KM), which belongs to the class of flavonoids. The objective of this study was to determine the wound healing effects of KM. Materials and methods The wound healing effects of KM with two different concentrations (0.5% and 1% [weight/weight, w/w]) were evaluated in incisional and excisional wound models on diabetic and nondiabetic rats by macroscopic, biomechanical, biochemical, and histopathological analyses. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin. The KM ointments were prepared using a mixture of glycol stearate:propylene glycol:liquid paraffin (3:6:1); 0.5 g of the ointments were topically applied on the wounded areas once a day for 7 and 14 d. On days 0, 7, and 14, wounds were photographed, and macroscopic examination of the wounds was performed. After 7 and 14 d, hydroxyproline levels, biomechanical analysis, and histopathological parameters (reepithelialization, thickness of granulation tissue, angiogenesis, presence of inflammation, deposition of collagen, presence of fibrosis, degree of dermal inflammation, and number of mast cells) were assessed. Results The best wound healing effect was observed in the diabetic excisional and nondiabetic incisional wounds (92.12% and 94.17%, respectively) treated with 1% (w/w) KM ointment for 14 d according to macroscopic examination. The nondiabetic excis…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Özay, Y., Güzel, S., Yumrutaş, Ö., Pehlivanoğlu, B., Erdoğdu, İ. H., Yildirim, Z., Türk, B. A., & Darcan, S.
Affiliations
  • Adıyaman University (TR)
  • Mersin Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Adnan Menderes University (TR)
  • Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Özay, Yusuf
Venue
Journal of Surgical Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
233
Pages
284-296
ISSN
0022-4804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890918388
Cited by
158
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Surgical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ahi Evran Üniversitesi
  • Faculty of Arts and Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Flavonoids in Medical Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Bee Products Chemical Analysis
Keywords
kaempferol, wound healing, diabetes mellitus, diabetic wounds, flavonoids, topical ointment, excision wound, incisional wounds, re-epithelialization, collagen deposition, hydroxyproline, tensile strength, angiogenesis, fibrosis, mast cells, streptozotocin-induced diabetes, rats, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
MeSH terms
Surgical Wound, Administration, Cutaneous, Animals, Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Male, Ointments, Skin, Streptozocin, Wound Healing, Treatment Outcome, Kaempferols, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review