Cited by 21Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityDigital Transformation in Industry

Navigating the DevOps landscape

Open access
Zhang, Xinrui, Zhao, Pincan, Jaskolka, Jason·2025·Journal of Systems and Software

Abstract

DevOps, with its increasing prevalence in both industry and academia, has evolved into various DevOps variants (namely XOps) to address emerging technological and operational challenges. However, this proliferation has created confusion and a lack of clarity about the systematic understanding of these XOps and their interrelationship in the DevOps landscape, leading to fragmented knowledge and application. This research seeks to construct a comprehensive picture of the existing DevOps landscape, clarifying the nature and nuances of various XOps, to guide effective future studies and implementations. Utilizing Multivocal Literature Review (MLR), 80 gathered documents are thoroughly examined from throughout the whole community, encompassing both white and grey literature, to map the DevOps landscape. Our review systematically discovered 38 XOps terms and 13 well-studied XOps including AIOps, BizDevOps, CloudOps, DataOps, DevSecOps, FinOps, GitOps, MLOps, ModelOps, NetDevOps, NoOps, SecDevOps and TwinOps. We provided dictionary-like resource that elucidates the core concepts and main ideas associated with each XOps. An in-depth understanding of intricate evolution from DevOps to XOps is delved into, supplemented by the research of relationships between XOps and various technological enablers as well as relationships between XOps and organizational teams, contributing to the ongoing dialogue surrounding their application and evolution. This paper provides a foundational understanding of the DevOps landscape including open issues and challenges, current and future trends, assisting both researchers and practitioners in navigating this complex field. It establishes a platform for further research and practical applications in the evolving field of DevOps and XOps.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2024.112331

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study's breadth-over-depth approach may overlook the nuanced challenges and unique solutions associated with specific XOps variants.

    “The study's breadth-over-depth approach, while valuable for providing a high-level overview, may overlook the nuanced challenges and unique solutions associated with specific XOps variants.”
  • The synthesis of a wide range of sources can dilute the depth of analysis for individual practices, potentially leaving gaps in understanding the detailed implementation issues of each variant.

    “The synthesis of a wide range of sources can dilute the depth of analysis for individual practices, potentially leaving gaps in understanding the detailed implementation issues of each variant.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Zhao, P., & Jaskolka, J.
Affiliations
Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Pincan
Venue
Journal of Systems and Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
223
Pages
112331
ISSN
0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406348806
Cited by
21
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10
FWCI
22.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2019-06306)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
DevOps, AIOps, DataOps, DevSecOps, FinOps, GitOps, MLOps, organizational teams, technological enablers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review