Cited by 3Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutCOVID-19 and Mental HealthStress and Burnout Research

Resident burnout trends during COVID-19: a retrospective observational study

Open access
Elwood, Adam D., MaloneyPatel, Nell, Hutchinson-Colas, Juana·2023·Journal of surgical education

Abstract

Objective This study was designed to assess the effects of the coronavirus disease pandemic on job satisfaction (JS) and burnout among surgical sub-specialty residents.Design This is a retrospective, observational, survey-based study. We administered a web-based questionnaire to surgical sub-specialty residents, and results were compared to a prior study in 2016. The questionnaire included elements on demographics, JS, burnout, and self-care habits. Basic statistical analyses were used to compare data from 2020 and 2016.Setting This study takes place at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, a single mid-sized New Jersey-based academic institution.Participants This survey was sent to all obstetrics and gynecology and general surgery residents from every postgraduate year based out of our institution. The survey was sent to a total of 50 residents across the 2 programs. Forty total residents responded to the survey, with a response rate of 80%.Results JS was significantly higher in 2020 than 2016 (p < 0.001). There were no differences between postgraduate years for 2020 or 2016 in emotional exhaustion (p = 0.29, p = 0.75), personal accomplishment (p = 0.88, p = 0.26), or depersonalization (p = 0.14, p = 0.59) burnout scores. A total of 0% of residents in 2020 worked fewer than 61 hours per week. Residents in 2020 exercised more (40.0% vs 21.6%), had similar alcohol usage (60%), and had similar diets to residents in 2016. Residents in 2020 were less likely to regret their specialty (7.5% vs 21.6%), consider changing residencies (30.0% vs 37.8%), or consider a career change (15.0% vs 45.9%).Conclusions JS scores were significantly higher during the coronavirus disease pandemic. The cancellation of elective surgeries led to a lighter workload for surgical residents. Residents were uncertain of their role during the pandemic, however, new stressors encouraged residents to seek alternative methods for personal wellness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.02.014

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have documented increases in depersonalization in situations of chronic stress, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “Previous studies have documented increases in depersonalization in situations of chronic stress, such as the COVID-19 pandemic (58)”

    From Evolution of burnout syndrome in Spanish healthcare professionals during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: psychosocial variables involved (2025) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Results (page unavailable) report a lower average depersonalization score during the COVID-19 pandemic than in 2016: 7.0 versus 13.0, not an increase. The Conclusions caution that different survey scales prevent a statistically valid comparison of burnout scores across those years; the paper therefore does not document the claimed increase. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elwood, A. D., MaloneyPatel, N., & Hutchinson-Colas, J.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
  • Elwood, Adam D.
  • Hutchinson-Colas, Juana
Venue
Journal of surgical education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
80
Issue
6
Pages
846-852
ISSN
  • 1878-7452 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-7204
OpenAlex
W4322217345
Cited by
3
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of surgical education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
burnout, job satisfaction, COVID-19 pandemic, surgical residents, emotional exhaustion, personal accomplishment, depersonalization, resident workload, elective surgery cancellation, self-care, physical activity, alcohol consumption, diet, career change intentions, resident well-being
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Burnout, Professional, Gynecology, Humans, Internship and Residency, Obstetrics, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review