Cited by 40Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coupled vibration control with tuned mass damper for long-span bridges

Chen, S.R., Cai, C.S.·2004·Journal of Sound and Vibration

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.11.056

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Conti, 1996, Wind effects on Normandie cable-stayed bridge: comparison between full aeroelastic model tests and quasi-steady analytical approach, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 65, 189, 10.1016/S0167-6105(95)00040-2 · DOI
  2. T. Takeda, Y. Niihara, M. Ohshio, R. Nakano, F. Kozuma, A. Ogawa, Vertical gust response control of long span cable-stayed bridge under cantilever construction by active mass damper, Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Structural Control, 1998, pp. 835–842.
  3. Pourzeynali, 2002, Control of flutter of suspension bridge deck using TMD, Wind and Structures, 5, 407, 10.12989/was.2002.5.5.407 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Omenzetter, 2002, Study of passive deck-flaps flutter control system on full bridge model. I: theory, American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128, 264, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:3(264) · DOI
  5. T. Miyata, H. Yamada, New ideas on the aero-elastic coupled behavior control of the super long span bridges, Proceedings of Second World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan, Vol. 2, 1999, pp. 843–850.
  6. Gu, 2001, Parametric study on multiple tuned mass dampers for buffeting control of Yangpu bridge, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 89, 987, 10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00094-0 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gu, 1998, Increase of critical flutter wind speed of long-span bridges using tuned mass dampers, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 73, 113, 10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00282-1 · DOI
  8. Abe, 1995, Tuned mass dampers for structures with closely spaced natural frequencies, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24, 247, 10.1002/eqe.4290240209 · DOI
  9. Jain, 1998, Effect of modal damping on bridge aeroelasticity, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 77–78, 421, 10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00161-5 · DOI
  10. Fujino, 1993, Design formulas for tuned mass dampers based on a perturbation technique, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22, 833, 10.1002/eqe.4290221002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lin, 1983, Multimode bridge response to wind excitation, American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 109, 586, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1983)109:2(586) · DOI
  12. Tanaka, 1993, Multi-mode flutter analysis and two and three dimensional model test on bridges with non-analogous modal shapes, Journal of Structural Mechanics and Earthquake Engineering, 10, 35
  13. Bucher, 1988, Stochastic stability of bridges considering coupled modes, American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 114, 2055, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:12(2055) · DOI
  14. Jain, 1996, Coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges, American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of Structural Engineering, 122, 716
  15. Katsuchi, 1998, Multi-mode flutter and buffeting analysis of the Akashi-Kaikyo bridge, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 77&78, 431, 10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00162-7 · DOI
  16. Thorbek, 1998, Coupled buffeting response of suspension bridges, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 74–76, 839, 10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00076-2 · DOI
  17. Cai, 2000, Flutter derivatives based random parametric excitation aerodynamic analysis, Computers & Structures, 75, 463, 10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00107-8 · DOI
  18. Linda, 1998, A discussion of modal uncoupling and an approximated closed-form solution for weakly coupled systems with application to acoustics, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1923, 10.1121/1.421344 · DOI
  19. Chen, 2003, Optimal variables of TMDs for multi-mode buffeting control of long-span bridges, Journal of Wind and Structures, 6, 387, 10.12989/was.2003.6.5.387 · DOI
  20. Xu, 1992, Dynamic characteristics of multiple substructures with closely spaced frequencies, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21, 1059, 10.1002/eqe.4290211203 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
Chen, S. R., & Cai, C. S.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Sound and Vibration
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
278
Issue
1-2
Pages
449-459
ISSN
0022-460X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996138635
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Sound and Vibration (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Louisiana State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Keywords
tuned mass damper, long-span bridges, wind-induced vibration, flutter, aerodynamic damping, bending modes, wind speed dependence, vibration control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review