The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Control of flutter of suspension bridge deck using TMD
Abstract
Passive control of the flutter condition of suspension bridges using a combined vertical and torsional tuned mass damper (TMD) system is presented. The proposed TMD system has two degrees of freedom, which are tuned close to the frequencies corresponding to vertical and torsional symmetric modes of the bridge which get coupled during flutter. The bridge-TMD system is analyzed for finding critical wind speed for flutter using a finite element approach. Thomas Suspension Bridge is analyzed as an illustrative example. The effectiveness of the TMD system in increasing the critical flutter speed of the bridge is investigated through a parametric study. The results of the parametric study led to the optimization of some important parameters such as mass ratio, TMD damping ratio, tuning frequency, and number of TMD systems which provide maximum critical flutter wind speed of the suspension bridge.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pourzeynali and Datta [164] showed the efficiency of the TMD in control of the flutter in suspension bridge deck.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Pourzeynali and Datta [164]
In the citing paper
“They reported that the mass ratio, damping ratio, tuning frequency, and number of the TMDs create maximum critical flutter wind speed of the suspension bridge.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Pourzeynali and Datta [164]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 1980, J. Struct. Div., 106, 2053, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0005544 · DOI
- 1979, J. Struct. Div., 105, 767, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0005133 · DOI
- 1994, J. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 813, 10.1002/eqe.4290230802 · DOI · Paper page
- 1996, J. Struct. Div., 122, 83, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:1(83) · DOI
- 1996, J. Struct. Eng. Earthq. Eng., 42A, 847
- 1993, J. Struct. Eng., 119, 3482, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3482) · DOI
- 1992, J. Eng. Mech., 118, 2017, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:10(2017) · DOI
- 1998, J. Wind Eng. and Ind. Aerod., 73, 111, 10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00282-1 · DOI
- 1998, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 77-78, 421, 10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00161-5 · DOI
- 1996, J. Struct. Eng., 122, 716, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:7(716) · DOI
- 1997, J. Earthq. Eng, Struct. Dyn., 26, 307, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199703)26:3<307::AID-EQE639>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
- 1992, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 41-44, 143
- 2000, J. Engrg. Structs.,, 22, 1195, 10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00049-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 1988, J. Struct. Mech. Earthq. Eng., 398/1-10, 413
- 1971, J. the Engrg. Mech. Div., 97, 1717, 10.1061/JMCEA3.0001526 · DOI
- 1998, J. Eng. Mech., 124, 718, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:7(718) · DOI
- 1998, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 80, 105
- 2000, J. Eng. Struct., 23, 1538
- 1992, J. Eng. Mech., 118, 20, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:1(20) · DOI
- 1989, J. Wind Eng., 41, 105
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers
Elias, S., & Matsagar, V. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.015 · Cited by 556
Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review
Rahimi, F., Aghayari, R., & Samali, B. (2020) · Civil Engineering Journal · doi:10.28991/cej-2020-03091571 · Cited by 138
“[164] Pourzeynali, S. and T. Datta, Control of Flutter of Suspension Bridge Deck Using TMD. Wind and Structures, 2002.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Pourzeynali, S., & Datta, T. K.
- ORCID
- Pourzeynali, Saeid
- Venue
- Wind and Structures
- Publisher
- Techno-Press
- Published
- 2002-10-25
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 407-422
- ISSN
- 1226-6116 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973867181
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wind and Structures (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
- Keywords
- flutter, suspension bridges, tuned mass damper, passive vibration control, TMD parameter optimization, mass ratio, damping ratio, tuning frequency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
