Cited by 23Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsHormonal and reproductive studies

Daily Oral l-Arginine Plus Tadalafil in Diabetic Patients with Erectile Dysfunction: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

El Taieb, Moustafa, Hegazy, Eisa, Ibrahim, Ahmed·2019·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction is a common condition among diabetic men. Many treatments are now available with variable responses. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of daily oral l-arginine plus tadalafil in diabetic patients with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction. Methods: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted with 108 diabetic male patients. Each patient was assessed by medical and sexual histories, International Index of Erectile Function 5-item questionnaires, pharmaco-penile duplex ultrasonography, and serum testosterone level. Main Outcome Measure: Improvement in International Index of Erectile Function 5-item, serum testosterone level and pharmaco-penile duplex ultrasonography. Results: Erectile functions were significantly improved in all patients after treatment as compared with baseline and placebo (P < .001). Patients who received both drugs showed significant improvement compared to those treated with single drugs, as assessed by International Index of Erectile Function scores and total testosterone (P < .001). Pharmaco-penile ultrasound duplex results showed non-significant differences among patients treated with both drugs and those with each drug alone. Conclusion: Daily use of l-arginine with tadalafil significantly increased the International Index of Erectile Function scores and total testosterone levels as compared to each drug alone in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction. No differences were found based on pharmaco-penile duplex findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.06.009

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El Taieb, M., Hegazy, E., & Ibrahim, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Andrology , Sahary City, Aswan , Egypt
  • South Valley University (EG)
  • Assiut University (EG)
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2019-07-17
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1390-1397
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2957026893
Cited by
22
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, L-arginine, tadalafil, combination therapy, International Index of Erectile Function, serum testosterone, penile blood flow
MeSH terms
Tadalafil, Adult, Arginine, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Penile Erection, Treatment Outcome, Diabetes Complications, Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review