Cited by 70Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFractal and DNA sequence analysisRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

A new criterion and method for amino acid classification

Kosiol, Carolin, Goldman, Nick, H. Buttimore, Nigel·2004·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

It is accepted that many evolutionary changes of amino acid sequence in proteins are conservative: the replacement of one amino acid by another residue has a far greater chance of being accepted if the two residues have similar properties. It is difficult, however, to identify relevant physicochemical properties that capture this similarity. In this paper we introduce a criterion that determines similarity from an evolutionary point of view. Our criterion is based on the description of protein evolution by a Markov process and the corresponding matrix of instantaneous replacement rates. It is inspired by the conductance, a quantity that reflects the strength of mixing in a Markov process. Furthermore we introduce a method to divide the 20 amino acid residues into subsets that achieve good scores with our criterion. The criterion has the time-invariance property that different time distances of the same amino acid replacement rate matrix lead to the same grouping; but different rate matrices lead to different groupings. Therefore it can be used as an automated method to compare matrices derived from consideration of different types of proteins, or from parts of proteins sharing different structural or functional features. We present the groupings resulting from two standard matrices used in sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree estimation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.12.010

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kosiol, C., Goldman, N., & H. Buttimore, N.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Kosiol, Carolin
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
228
Issue
1
Pages
97-106
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084340562
Cited by
70
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
amino acid classification, amino acid similarity, protein evolution, Markov processes, conductance, time invariance, physicochemical properties, sequence alignment, phylogenetic tree estimation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Markov Chains, Models, Genetic, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review