Cited by 373Gut microbiota and healthBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingAppendicitis Diagnosis and Management

Biofilms in the large bowel suggest an apparent function of the human vermiform appendix

Randal Bollinger, R., Barbas, Andrew S., Bush, Errol L., Lin, Shu S., Parker, William·2007·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

The human vermiform ("worm-like") appendix is a 5-10cm long and 0.5-1cm wide pouch that extends from the cecum of the large bowel. The architecture of the human appendix is unique among mammals, and few mammals other than humans have an appendix at all. The function of the human appendix has long been a matter of debate, with the structure often considered to be a vestige of evolutionary development despite evidence to the contrary based on comparative primate anatomy. The appendix is thought to have some immune function based on its association with substantial lymphatic tissue, although the specific nature of that putative function is unknown. Based (a) on a recently acquired understanding of immune-mediated biofilm formation by commensal bacteria in the mammalian gut, (b) on biofilm distribution in the large bowel, (c) the association of lymphoid tissue with the appendix, (d) the potential for biofilms to protect and support colonization by commensal bacteria, and (e) on the architecture of the human bowel, we propose that the human appendix is well suited as a "safe house" for commensal bacteria, providing support for bacterial growth and potentially facilitating re-inoculation of the colon in the event that the contents of the intestinal tract are purged following exposure to a pathogen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.08.032

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, the role of the GALT is to preserve the commensal bacteria which can recolonize the colon in diseases in which these bacteria are lost.

    “In humans the role of this GALT (gut associated lymphoid tissue) is to preserve the commensal bacteria which can recolonize the colon in diseases in which these bacteria are lost (Bollinger et al., 2007).”

    From Anatomical Particularities of the Cecum in Rabbits and Chinchillas (2014) · cites this paper as Bollinger et al., 2007

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Randal Bollinger, R., Barbas, A. S., Bush, E. L., Lin, S. S., & Parker, W.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Parker, William
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
249
Issue
4
Pages
826-831
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146666438
Cited by
373
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
appendix, biofilm, commensal bacteria, large bowel, cecum, lymphoid tissue, bacterial colonization, reinoculation, gut microbiota
MeSH terms
Animals, Appendix, Bacteria, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestine, Large, Symbiosis, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review