Cited by 176Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGene Regulatory Network AnalysisNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation

Modeling the segmentation clock as a network of coupled oscillations in the Notch, Wnt and FGF signaling pathways

Goldbeter, Albert, Pourquié, Olivier·2008·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

The formation of somites in the course of vertebrate segmentation is governed by an oscillator known as the segmentation clock, which is characterized by a period ranging from 30 min to a few hours depending on the organism. This oscillator permits the synchronized activation of segmentation genes in successive cohorts of cells in the presomitic mesoderm in response to a periodic signal emitted by the segmentation clock, thereby defining the future segments. Recent microarray experiments [Dequeant, M.L., Glynn, E., Gaudenz, K., Wahl, M., Chen, J., Mushegian, A., Pourquie, O., 2006. A complex oscillating network of signaling genes underlies the mouse segmentation clock. Science 314, 1595-1598] indicate that the Notch, Wnt and Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) signaling pathways are involved in the mechanism of the segmentation clock. By means of computational modeling, we investigate the conditions in which sustained oscillations occur in these three signaling pathways. First we show that negative feedback mediated by the Lunatic Fringe protein on intracellular Notch activation can give rise to periodic behavior in the Notch pathway. We then show that negative feedback exerted by Axin2 on the degradation of beta-catenin through formation of the Axin2 destruction complex can produce oscillations in the Wnt pathway. Likewise, negative feedback on FGF signaling mediated by the phosphatase product of the gene MKP3/Dusp6 can produce oscillatory gene expression in the FGF pathway. Coupling the Wnt, Notch and FGF oscillators through common intermediates can lead to synchronized oscillations in the three signaling pathways or to complex periodic behavior, depending on the relative periods of oscillations in the three pathways. The phase relationships between cycling genes in the three pathways depend on the nature of the coupling between the pathways and on their relative autonomous periods. The model provides a framework for analyzing the dynamics of the segmentation clock in terms of a network of oscillating modules involving the Wnt, Notch and FGF signaling pathways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.01.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies develop a story line where a simulation model has been successively refined, extended, or composed ([28, 33, 34, 36, 41, 46, 48, 49, 51, 56]).

    “Some studies develop a story line where a simulation model has been successively refined, extended, or composed ([28, 33, 34, 36, 41, 46, 48, 49, 51, 56]).”
  • A third cluster includes the pathways of Notch [33, 48] and Notch + MAPK/ERK [36].

    “A third cluster includes the pathways of Notch [33, 48] and Notch + MAPK/ERK [36].”
  • The simulation models developed in [29, 32, 34-36, 39, 41] had neither been calibrated nor validated explicitly, because they used parameter values from other studies.

    “The simulations models developed in [29, 32, 34–36, 39, 41] had neither been calibrated nor validated explicitly, because they used parameter values from other studies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldbeter, A., & Pourquié, O.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • Stowers Institute for Medical Research (US)
Corresponding author
Goldbeter, Albert
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
252
Issue
3
Pages
574-585
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012986637
Cited by
176
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD043158)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Keywords
segmentation clock, somitogenesis, Notch signaling, Wnt signaling, FGF signaling, coupled oscillators, negative feedback, lunatic fringe, Axin2, β-catenin degradation, oscillation synchronization, phase equilibria, presomitic mesoderm, gene expression oscillations
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Clocks, Fibroblast Growth Factors, Models, Biological, Signal Transduction, Somites, Body Patterning, Feedback, Physiological, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Embryonic Development, Wnt Proteins, Receptors, Notch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review