Cited by 14Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGene Regulatory Network AnalysisWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer

Mathematical models for the Notch and Wnt signaling pathways and the crosstalk between them during somitogenesis

Open access
Wang, Hong-yan, Huang, Yan-xin, Qi, Yun-feng, Zhang, Yu, Bao, Yong-li, Sun, Lu-guo, Zheng, Li-hua, Zhang, Yu-wei +2 more·2013·Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling

Abstract

Background: Somitogenesis is a fundamental characteristic feature of development in various animal embryos. Molecular evidence has proved that the Notch and Wnt pathways play important roles in regulating the process of somitogenesis and there is crosstalk between these two pathways. However, it is difficult to investigate the detailed mechanism of these two pathways and their interactions in somitogenesis through biological experiments. In recent years some mathematical models have been proposed for the purpose of studying the dynamics of the Notch and Wnt pathways in somitogenesis. Unfortunately, only a few of these models have explored the interactions between them. Results: In this study, we have proposed three mathematical models for the Notch signalling pathway alone, the Wnt signalling pathway alone, and the interactions between them. These models can simulate the dynamics of the Notch and Wnt pathways in somitogenesis, and are capable of reproducing the observations derived from wet experiments. They were used to investigate the molecular mechanisms of the Notch and Wnt pathways and their crosstalk in somitogenesis through the model simulations. Conclusions: Three mathematical models are proposed for the Notch and Wnt pathways and their interaction during somitogenesis. The simulations demonstrate that the extracellular Notch and Wnt signals are essential for the oscillating expressions of both Notch and Wnt target genes. Moreover, the internal negative feedback loops and the three levels of crosstalk between these pathways play important but distinct roles in maintaining the system oscillation. In addition, the results of the parameter sensitivity analysis of the models indicate that the Notch pathway is more sensitive to perturbation in somitogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1742-4682-10-27

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some simulation studies resulted in the development of multiple simulation models that are neither extensions nor compositions but rather form a revision or alternative to other simulation models developed in the same study: [33, 39, 41, 46, 48, 49].

    “Some simulation studies resulted in the development of multiple simulation models that are neither extensions nor compositions but rather form a revision or alternative to other simulation models developed in the same study: [33, 39, 41, 46, 48, 49].”

    From Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some authors just calibrated their simulation models ([33, 46, 48, 49, 53, 57]).

    “Some authors just calibrated their simulation models ([33, 46, 48, 49, 53, 57])”

    From Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Methods section, “Parameter learning algorithm” (page unavailable), says the authors trained most model parameters using microarray data, supporting the calibration claim. But “just calibrated” is too restrictive: the Results also report parameter-sensitivity analyses and say the Wnt simulation reproduced wet experimental results. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Requirements could only be identified in the publications of Lee et al. (2003) [28], Wang et al. (2013) [48], Chen et al. (2014) [49], and Haack et al. (2020) [56].

    “We could only identify Requirements in the publications of Lee et al. (2003) [28], Wang et al. (2013) [48], Chen et al. (2014) [49], and Haack et al. (2020) [56].”
  • A third cluster includes the pathways of Notch [33, 48] and Notch + MAPK/ERK [36].

    “A third cluster includes the pathways of Notch [33, 48] and Notch + MAPK/ERK [36].”
  • Some studies develop a story line where a simulation model has been successively refined, extended, or composed ([28, 33, 34, 36, 41, 46, 48, 49, 51, 56]).

    “Some studies develop a story line where a simulation model has been successively refined, extended, or composed ([28, 33, 34, 36, 41, 46, 48, 49, 51, 56]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dequ M-L Pourqui O Segmental patterning of the vertebrate embryonic axis Nat Rev Genet 2008 9 370 382 18414404

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, H.-Y., Huang, Y.-X., Qi, Y.-F., Zhang, Y., Bao, Y.-L., Sun, L.-G., Zheng, L.-H., Zhang, Y.-W., Ma, Z.-Q., & Li, Y.-X.
Affiliations
Northeast Normal University (CN)
Venue
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
Published
2013-04-20
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
27-27
ISSN
1742-4682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108654247
Cited by
14
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61172183)
  • People's Government of Jilin Province
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (11QNJJ021)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Keywords
Notch signaling, Wnt signaling, somitogenesis, pathway crosstalk, mathematical modeling of signaling, gene expression oscillations, negative feedback loop, parameter sensitivity analysis, embryonic development
MeSH terms
Animals, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Models, Theoretical, Signal Transduction, Somites, Wnt Proteins, Receptors, Notch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review