Cited by 66Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

When is emotional contagion adaptive?

Nakahashi, Wataru, Ohtsuki, Hisashi·2015·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

Empathy plays an important role in animal social behavior. Since emotional contagion forms one of the bases of empathy, here we study conditions for emotional contagion to be adaptive, compared with other behavioral rules such as behavioral mimicry. We consider the situation where the focal individual (=observer) reacts to a behavior of another individual (=demonstrator). By emotional contagion one spontaneously copies the emotional state of the demonstrator and takes a behavior driven by that emotion. By behavioral mimicry, in contrast, one copies the behavior of the demonstrator itself. Through mathematical models we show that emotional contagion is adaptive when the environmental similarity between the demonstrator and the observer is intermediate. The advantage of adopting emotional contagion over behavioral mimicry increases when observing others' behavior is difficult or cognitively demanding. We show that emotional contagion is often a more flexible strategy than behavioral mimicry in order to cope with the living environment. In other words, emotional contagion often works as a better social learning strategy. These results suggest some ecological conditions that would favor the evolution of emotional contagion, and give a part of the explanations of why emotional contagion is frequently observed in group-living animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.014

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotional contagion is a more flexible strategy than behavioral mimicry because one emotion can lead to a wide range of adaptive behaviors.

    “As one emotion can lead to a wide range of adaptive behaviors, for example, fear can result in freezing or fleeing depending on the environmental circumstances, emotional contagion is a more flexible strategy than behavioral mimicry, in which one copies the behavior of another.151”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakahashi, W., & Ohtsuki, H.
Affiliations
The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakahashi, Wataru
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
380
Pages
480-488
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W821264168
Cited by
66
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (25118006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
emotional contagion, behavioral mimicry, empathy, social learning, evolution of social behavior, environmental similarity, group-living animals, animal social behavior
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Emotions, Humans, Models, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review