The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PCA3 Molecular Urine Assay Correlates With Prostate Cancer Tumor Volume: Implication in Selecting Candidates for Active Surveillance
Abstract
PURPOSE: Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) has shown promise as a molecular marker in prostate cancer detection. We assessed the association of urinary PCA3 score with prostatectomy tumor volume and other clinical and pathological features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine specimens were collected after digital rectal examination from 59 men scheduled for prostate biopsy and 83 men scheduled for radical prostatectomy. Prostatectomy findings were evaluable for 96 men. PCA3 and prostate specific antigen mRNAs were quantified with Gen-Probe DTS 400 System. The PCA3 score was defined as the ratio of PCA3 mRNA/prostate specific antigen mRNA x10(3). RESULTS: The PCA3 score in men with negative biopsies (30) and positive biopsies (29) were significantly different (median 21.1 and 31.0, respectively, p = 0.029). The PCA3 score was significantly correlated with total tumor volume in prostatectomy specimens (r = 0.269, p = 0.008), and was also associated with prostatectomy Gleason score (6 vs 7 or greater, p = 0.005) but not with other clinical and pathological features. The PCA3 score was significantly different when comparing low volume/low grade cancer (dominant tumor volume less than 0.5 cc, Gleason score 6) and significant cancer (p = 0.007). On multivariate analysis PCA3 was the best predictor of total tumor volume in prostatectomy (p = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the PCA3 score could discriminate low volume cancer (total tumor volume less than 0.5 cc) well with area under the curve of 0.757. CONCLUSIONS: The PCA3 score appears to stratify men based on prostatectomy tumor volume and Gleason score, and may have clinical applicability in selecting men who have low volume/low grade cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Can Urinary PCA3 Supplement PSA in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer?
Wei, J. T., Feng, Z., Partin, A. W., Brown, E., Thompson, I., Sokoll, L., Chan, D. W., Lotan, Y., Kibel, A. S., Busby, J. E., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.52.8505 · Cited by 274
Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer
Madu, C. O., & Lu, Y. (2010) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.1.150 · Cited by 261
Mehra, R., Shi, Y., Udager, A. M., Prensner, J. R., Sahu, A., Iyer, M. K., Siddiqui, J., Cao, X., Wei, J., Jiang, H., et al. (2014) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1016/j.neo.2014.11.006 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakanishi, H., Groskopf, J., Fritsche, H. A., Bhadkamkar, V., Blase, A., Kumar, S. V., Davis, J. W., Troncoso, P., Rittenhouse, H., & Babaian, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1804-1810
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1987998253
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PCA3 Molecular Urine Assay Correlates With Prostate Cancer Tumor Volume: Implication in Selecting Candidates for Active Surveillance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.013
- The paper
- Nakanishi, H., Groskopf, J., Fritsche, H. A., Bhadkamkar, V., Blase, A., Kumar, S. V., Davis, J. W., Troncoso, P., Rittenhouse, H., & Babaian, R. J. (2008). PCA3 Molecular Urine Assay Correlates With Prostate Cancer Tumor Volume: Implication in Selecting Candidates for Active Surveillance. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.