Cited by 95Cancer-related molecular mechanisms researchProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Novel RNA In Situ Hybridization Assay for the Long Noncoding RNA SChLAP1 Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Open access

Abstract

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are an emerging class of oncogenic molecules implicated in a diverse range of human malignancies. We recently identified SChLAP1 as a novel lncRNA that demonstrates outlier expression in a subset of prostate cancers, promotes tumor cell invasion and metastasis, and associates with lethal disease. Based on these findings, we sought to develop an RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) assay for SChLAP1 to 1) investigate the spectrum of SChLAP1 expression from benign prostatic tissue to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and 2) to determine whether SChLAP1 expression by ISH is associated with outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized disease. The results from our current study demonstrate that SChLAP1 expression increases with prostate cancer progression, and high SChLAP1 expression by ISH is associated with poor outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer by both univariate (hazard ratio = 2.343, P = .005) and multivariate (hazard ratio = 1.99, P = .032) Cox regression analyses. This study highlights a potential clinical utility for SChLAP1 ISH as a novel tissue-based biomarker assay for outcome prognostication after radical prostatectomy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neo.2014.11.006

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prostate tumor microarray with correlated clinical information from 120 clinically localized PCa patients was constructed by the University of Michigan Center for Translational Pathology.

    “The prostate tumor microarray (TMA) with correlated clinical information from 120 clinically localized PCa patients was constructed by the University of Michigan Center for Translational Pathology as previously reported65.”

    From Genome-scale CRISPR screens identify PTGES3 as a direct modulator of androgen receptor function in advanced prostate cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Tissue Microarray (TMA) Construction section describes TMAs from patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and says detailed clinicopathologic data were maintained for the cohort. It gives 208 patients, not 120, and identifies the University of Michigan Prostate Cancer SPORE Tissue Core rather than the Center for Translational Pathology. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mehra, R., Shi, Y., Udager, A. M., Prensner, J. R., Sahu, A., Iyer, M. K., Siddiqui, J., Cao, X., Wei, J., Jiang, H., Feng, F. Y., & Chinnaiyan, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Mehra, Rohit
  • Chinnaiyan, Arul M.
Venue
Neoplasia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1121-1127
ISSN
1476-5586 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052750768
Cited by
95
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neoplasia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • American Cancer Society
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation
  • Evans Medical Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (UO1 CA113913)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50-CA-69568, F30CA180376, P50CA069568, P50CA186786, U01CA113913)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007863)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
SChLAP1, long non-coding RNA, RNA in situ hybridization, localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, prognostic factors, disease progression, castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastasis, tumor invasion, clinical outcomes
MeSH terms
Humans, Male, Neoplasm Proteins, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms, RNA, Biomarkers, Tumor, In Situ Hybridization, RNA, Long Noncoding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review