Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PCA3 Score Before Radical Prostatectomy Predicts Extracapsular Extension and Tumor Volume

Open access
Whitman, Eric J., Groskopf, Jack, Ali, Amina, Chen, Yongmei, Blase, Amy, Furusato, Bungo, Petrovics, Gyorgy, Ibrahim, Mona, Elsamanoudi, Sally, Cullen, Jennifer, Sesterhenn, Isabell A., Brassell, Stephen, Rittenhouse, Harry, Srivastava, Shiv, McLeod, David G.·2008·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: PCA3 is a prostate specific, nonprotein coding RNA that is over expressed in prostate cancer. Recent studies showed the diagnostic potential of a urine based PCA3 for predicting biopsy outcome. We assessed the relationship between urine PCA3 and pathological features in whole mount radical prostatectomy specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Post-digital rectal examination urine specimens were obtained from 72 men with prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. PCA3 and PSA mRNA were measured. The ratio of PCA3 to PSA mRNA was recorded as a PCA3 score and correlated with data on each prostate specimen. RESULTS: Patients with extracapsular extension had a significantly higher median PCA3 score than patients without extracapsular extension (48.8 vs 18.7, p = 0.02). PCA3 score significantly correlated with total tumor volume (r = 0.38, p <0.01). On multivariate analysis PCA3 score was an independent predictor of extracapsular extension (p = 0.01) and total tumor volume less than 0.5 cc (p = 0.04). At a cutoff PCA3 score of 47 extracapsular extension was predicted with 94% specificity and an 80% positive predictive value. When combined with serum PSA and biopsy Gleason score, the ROC AUC for predicting extracapsular extension was 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: PCA3 detected in the post-digital rectal examination urine of patients with prostate cancer correlated with pathological findings. Therefore, it could provide prognostic information. To our knowledge this is the first report of a molecular urine assay that predicts extracapsular extension.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.060

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Whitman, E. J., Groskopf, J., Ali, A., Chen, Y., Blase, A., Furusato, B., Petrovics, G., Ibrahim, M., Elsamanoudi, S., Cullen, J., Sesterhenn, I. A., Brassell, S., Rittenhouse, H., Srivastava, S., & McLeod, D. G.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2008-11
Volume
180
Issue
5
Pages
1975-1979
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2054217474
Cited by
169
References
1
FWCI
16.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PCA3 Score Before Radical Prostatectomy Predicts Extracapsular Extension and Tumor Volume. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.060
The paper
Whitman, E. J., Groskopf, J., Ali, A., Chen, Y., Blase, A., Furusato, B., Petrovics, G., Ibrahim, M., Elsamanoudi, S., Cullen, J., Sesterhenn, I. A., Brassell, S., Rittenhouse, H., Srivastava, S., & McLeod, D. G. (2008). PCA3 Score Before Radical Prostatectomy Predicts Extracapsular Extension and Tumor Volume. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.060

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.