Cited by 38Sexual function and dysfunction studiesProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer survivorship and care

Erectile Aid Use by Men Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer

Bergman, Jonathan, Gore, John L., Penson, David F., Kwan, Lorna, Litwin, Mark S.·2009·Journal of Urology

Abstract

Purpose We evaluated associations between demographic and clinical characteristics, quality of life outcome measures and erectile aids in men treated for localized prostate cancer. Materials and methods Patients had clinically localized prostate cancer, were not using erectile aids at baseline and chose treatment with radical prostatectomy (275), external beam radiotherapy (70) or brachytherapy (80). Patient characteristics and health related quality of life outcomes were prospectively assessed at baseline and at regular intervals up to 48 months after treatment. Outcomes were assessed with SF-36, the American Urological Association symptom index and UCLA-PCI. We categorized use of a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, urethral alprostadil suppositories, penile injection therapy or a vacuum erection device after treatment as erectile aid use. We created a multivariate model examining baseline demographic, clinical and health related quality of life covariates associated with erectile aid use. Results Of the 425 patients 237 (56%) used an erectile aid at some point during the posttreatment period. In our multivariate model patients treated with external beam radiation were less likely to use an aid (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.69) and men with significant sexual bother (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.37-5.23), or with 1 or more comorbidities (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.08-2.93) were more likely to use an aid. Patient demographic characteristics were not associated with erectile aids. Conclusions After t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.001

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergman, J., Gore, J. L., Penson, D. F., Kwan, L., & Litwin, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2009-08
Volume
182
Issue
2
Pages
649-654
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2022125463
Cited by
38
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, localized prostate cancer, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, penile injection therapy, vacuum erection devices, radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, sexual bother, comorbidities, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Prostatic Neoplasms, Self-Help Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review