Time for Improvement in Semen Parameters After Varicocelectomy
Abstract
Purpose While there are a number of studies documenting a positive effect of varicocelectomy on semen parameters, the length of time required following varicocelectomy for semen quality to improve is not well established. Therefore, in this study we identified the changes with time in semen parameters after varicocelectomy. Materials and methods The records and database of 304 patients who underwent varicocele repair for subfertility were reviewed retrospectively. All men had at least 2 preoperative semen analyses as well as semen testing at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Results For the 100 patients who met the study inclusion criteria mean sperm counts increased significantly by 3 and 6 months after varicocelectomy (by 53% and 38% by 3 and 6 months, p = 0.0003 and 0.001, respectively). By 3 and 6 months the combined groups had a mean 2.5 and 1.5-fold higher total motile count compared to the preoperative total motile count, respectively. There was no further improvement in semen parameters in those men followed for more than 6 months. There were no statistically significant differences in the improvement in semen volume, motility, count or total motile count comparing the results at 3, 6 and more than 9 months postoperatively. Conclusions Sperm parameters improve by 3 months after varicocele repair and then do not improve further. This finding should allow physicians to decide quickly if varicocelectomy has been effective and, then, if required, plan on the use of other th…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three months is usually a sufficient time to see changes in semen analysis results.
“It is stated that 3 months is usually a sufficient time to see changes in semen analysis results [23][24][25].”
From Sperm concentration and semen volume increase after smoking cessation in infertile men (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sperm concentration and semen volume increase after smoking cessation in infertile men
Kulaksiz, D., Toprak, T., Tokat, E., Yilmaz, M., Ramazanoglu, M. A., Garayev, A., Sulukaya, M., Degirmentepe, R. B., Allahverdiyev, E., Gul, M., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/s41443-022-00605-0 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Is Varicocelectomy Useful for Subfertile Men with Isolated Teratozoospermia?
Choe, J. H., & Seo, J. T. (2015) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.014 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Al Bakri, A., Lo, K., Grober, E., Cassidy, D., Cardoso, J. P., & Jarvi, K.
- Affiliations
- Division of Urology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 227-231
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1973596458
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- varicocelectomy, semen parameters, sperm count, sperm motility, male infertility, subfertility, postoperative follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Varicocele, Semen Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review