Cited by 73Sperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health StudiesReproductive Health and Technologies

Time for Improvement in Semen Parameters After Varicocelectomy

Al Bakri, Ayman, Lo, Kirk, Grober, Ethan, Cassidy, Darby, Cardoso, Joao Paulo, Jarvi, Keith·2012·Journal of Urology

Abstract

Purpose While there are a number of studies documenting a positive effect of varicocelectomy on semen parameters, the length of time required following varicocelectomy for semen quality to improve is not well established. Therefore, in this study we identified the changes with time in semen parameters after varicocelectomy. Materials and methods The records and database of 304 patients who underwent varicocele repair for subfertility were reviewed retrospectively. All men had at least 2 preoperative semen analyses as well as semen testing at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Results For the 100 patients who met the study inclusion criteria mean sperm counts increased significantly by 3 and 6 months after varicocelectomy (by 53% and 38% by 3 and 6 months, p = 0.0003 and 0.001, respectively). By 3 and 6 months the combined groups had a mean 2.5 and 1.5-fold higher total motile count compared to the preoperative total motile count, respectively. There was no further improvement in semen parameters in those men followed for more than 6 months. There were no statistically significant differences in the improvement in semen volume, motility, count or total motile count comparing the results at 3, 6 and more than 9 months postoperatively. Conclusions Sperm parameters improve by 3 months after varicocele repair and then do not improve further. This finding should allow physicians to decide quickly if varicocelectomy has been effective and, then, if required, plan on the use of other th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al Bakri, A., Lo, K., Grober, E., Cassidy, D., Cardoso, J. P., & Jarvi, K.
Affiliations
  • Division of Urology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2012-01
Volume
187
Issue
1
Pages
227-231
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W1973596458
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
varicocelectomy, semen parameters, sperm count, sperm motility, male infertility, subfertility, postoperative follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Varicocele, Semen Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review