Cited by 11Sperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health StudiesUrologic and reproductive health conditions

Is Varicocelectomy Useful for Subfertile Men with Isolated Teratozoospermia?

Choe, Jin Ho, Seo, Ju Tae·2015·Urology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on sperm morphology in subfertile men with isolated teratozoospermia and a clinically palpable varicocele. Materials and methods A retrospective review was performed of men with isolated teratozoospermia who had undergone microsurgical varicocelectomy. Semen analyses following varicocelectomy were performed at 2- to 3-month intervals. Responders to the varicocelectomy were defined as those who fulfilled the following criteria in semen analysis: (1) an improvement in percentage of normal forms to ≥4% and (2) normal results for all other semen parameters. Results A total of 80 patients underwent unilateral varicocelectomy (n = 49) or bilateral varicocelectomy (n = 31) (mean age of 36 ± 0.4 years, range 24-44). After a mean postoperative follow-up period of 6.8 months, the mean percentage of normal sperm forms increased from 0.9% to 3.5% (P .05). No differences were observed in age, current smoking status, body mass index, or grade of varicocele between responders and nonresponders. Conclusion Varicocelectomy might be an option for treating subfertile patients with isolated teratozoospermia and a clinically apparent varicocele. However, patients should be advised that the surgery helps in limited patients only because more patients did not benefit from the surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.014

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have evaluated the role of varicocelectomy and antioxidants in improving sperm morphology, particularly for immature sperm and those with head and tail defects based on Kruger's classification.

    “Several studies have evaluated the role of varicocelectomy and antioxidants in improving sperm morphology, particularly for immature sperm and those with head and tail defects based on Kruger’s classification (97-104).”
  • In a retrospective study of 80 patients, only 20% of operated patients had significant benefits after varicocelectomy, with their mean morphology improving from 1.3% to 9.1%.

    “Another retrospective study on 80 patients found that only 20% of operated patients had significant benefits after varicocelectomy, with their mean morphology improving from 1.3% to 9.1% (102).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choe, J. H., & Seo, J. T.
Affiliations
Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center (KR)
Corresponding author
Seo, Ju Tae
Venue
Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
86
Issue
6
Pages
1123-1128
ISSN
0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1222270809
Cited by
11
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Urologic and reproductive health conditions
Keywords
varicocelectomy, teratozoospermia, male infertility, varicocele, sperm morphology, sperm motility, microsurgical varicocelectomy, subfertility
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Microsurgery, Retrospective Studies, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Varicocele, Semen Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review