Cited by 11Urological Disorders and TreatmentsGenital Health and DiseaseSexual function and dysfunction studies

Development of the penis during the human fetal period (13 to 36 weeks after conception)

Gallo, Carla B.M., Costa, Waldemar S., Furriel, Angelica, Bastos, Ana L., Sampaio, Francisco J.B.·2013·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed the development of the area of the penis and erectile structures (corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum) and the thickness of the tunica albuginea during the fetal period (13 to 36 weeks after conception) in humans to establish normative patterns of growth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 56 male human fetuses at 13 to 36 weeks after conception. We used histochemical and morphometric techniques to analyze the parameters of total penile area, area of corpora cavernosa, area of corpus spongiosum, and thickness of tunica albuginea in the dorsal and ventral regions using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland). RESULTS: Between 13 and 36 weeks after conception the area of the penis varies from 0.95 to 24.25 mm2. The area of the corpora cavernosa varies from 0.28 to 9.12 mm2, and the area of the corpus spongiosum varies from 0.14 to 3.99 mm2. The thickness of the tunica albuginea varies from 0.029 to 0.296 mm in the dorsal region and from 0.014 to 0.113 mm in the ventral region of the corpora cavernosa. CONCLUSIONS: We found a strong correlation between the total penile area, corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum with fetal age (weeks following conception). The growth rate was more intense during the second trimester (13 to 24 weeks of gestation) compared to the third trimester (25 to 36 weeks). Tunica albuginea thickness also was strongly correlated with fetal age and this structure was thicker in the dorsal vs ventral region.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.050

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The process of masculinization at the external genitalia starts in the late first/early second trimester, and the most intense phase of penile growth occurs later in the second trimester.

    “The process of masculinization at the external genitalia starts in the late first/early second trimester, and the most intense phase of penile growth occurs later in the second trimester [8].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallo, C. B. M., Costa, W. S., Furriel, A., Bastos, A. L., & Sampaio, F. J. B.
Affiliations
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2013-11
Volume
190
Issue
5
Pages
1876-1883
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2061642184
Cited by
11
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
penile development, corpus cavernosum, corpus spongiosum, erectile tissue, gestational age
MeSH terms
Cadaver, Gestational Age, Humans, Male, Penis, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review