The DOI matches its Crossref record; 143 of the 143 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta-analytic examination of the construct validity of the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review of Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
SITGREAVES, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 11,425
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 · Cited by 8,962
Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698 · Cited by 7,592
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · Cited by 6,903
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement
Saks, A. M. (2006) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940610690169 · Cited by 5,577
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Causes, and Consequences
Spector, P. (1997) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452231549 · Cited by 4,915
Cited by
Workplace Well-Being: The Role of Job Crafting and Autonomy Support
Slemp, G. R., Kern, M. L., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2015) · Psychology of Well-Being · doi:10.1186/s13612-015-0034-y · Cited by 270
Bowling, N. A., & Michel, J. S. (2011) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2011.634281 · Cited by 162
Self-citationThe downsides of digital labor: Exploring the toll incivility takes on online comment moderators
Riedl, M. J., Masullo, G. M., & Whipple, K. N. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106262 · Cited by 48
Forjan, D. N., Tuckey, M. R., & Li, Y. (2020) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2931 · Cited by 34
The pace of hospital life: a mixed methods study
Long, J. C., Pomare, C., Ellis, L. A., Churruca, K., & Braithwaite, J. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255775 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowling, N. A., & Hammond, G. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Vocational Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-77
- ISSN
- 0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009283611
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 143
- FWCI
- 17.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analytic examination of the construct validity of the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.004
- The paper
- Bowling, N. A., & Hammond, G. D. (2008). A meta-analytic examination of the construct validity of the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale. Journal of Vocational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
