The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marginalized populations in the United States: A research agenda
Open accessAbstract
International and national crises often highlight inequalities in the labor market that disproportionately affect individuals from marginalized backgrounds. The COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting changes in society due to social distancing measures, has showcased inequities in access to decent work and experiences of discrimination resulting in many of the vulnerable populations in the United States experiencing a much harsher impact on economic and work-related factors. The purpose of this essay is to describe how the COVID-19 pandemic may differentially affect workers of color, individuals from low-income backgrounds, and women in complex ways. First, this essay will discuss disproportionate representation of workers from low-income and racial/ethnic minority backgrounds in sectors most affected by COVID-19. Second, it will discuss the lack of decent work for low-income workers who perform “essential” tasks. Third, this essay will highlight economic and work-related implications of increased discrimination Asian Americans are experiencing in society. Finally, role conflict and stress for women who are managing additional unpaid work, including caretaking responsibilities, while needing to continue to engage in paid work will be examined. A research agenda will be set forth throughout the essay, calling for vocational psychologists to engage in research that fully examines how the COVID-19 pandemic is affecting vulnerable communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Green, H., Fernandez, R., & MacPhail, C. (2021) · Public Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/phn.12959 · Cited by 223
The Influence of Demographics and Personality on COVID-19 Coping in Young Adults
Volk, A. A., Brazil, K. J., Franklin-Luther, P., Dane, A. V., & Vaillancourt, T. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110398 · Cited by 120
Delaney, R. K., Locke, A., Pershing, M. L., Geist, C., Clouse, E., Precourt Debbink, M., Haaland, B., Tanner, A. J., Anzai, Y., & Fagerlin, A. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3997 · Cited by 82
Granger, S., Barker Caza, B., Ashford, S. J., & Reid, E. M. (2022) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103784 · Cited by 42
Baumel, K., Hamlett, M., Wheeler, B., Hall, D., Randall, A. K., & Mickelson, K. (2021) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2020.1868190 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Kantamneni, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Vocational Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 119
- Pages
- 103439
- ISSN
- 0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3023142148
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 101.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marginalized populations in the United States: A research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103439
- The paper
- Kantamneni, N. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on marginalized populations in the United States: A research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.