Cited by 41COVID-19 and Mental HealthLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyHealth disparities and outcomes

Living Through COVID-19: Social Distancing, Computer-Mediated Communication, and Well-Being in Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Adults

Baumel, Katie, Hamlett, Mara, Wheeler, Brittany, Hall, Deborah, Randall, Ashley K., Mickelson, Kristin·2021·Journal of Homosexuality

Abstract

COVID-19 has had far-reaching effects on people’s lives, with evidence of a disproportionate impact on marginalized groups. Given existing health disparities and research on minority stress, COVID-19 may have uniquely impacted psychological well-being among sexual minorities. In an online survey of adults in the U.S. (N = 1,007) conducted in April 2020, we examined differences between sexual minority and heterosexual participants in psychological well-being, social distancing, computer-mediated communication, and COVID-19-related worry and experiences. Sexual minorities reported lower thriving and greater psychological distress, social distancing, computer-mediated communication, and COVID-19 worry and experiences than heterosexual participants. Social distancing and distress were positively correlated among sexual minorities and more frequent computer-mediated communication predicted greater thriving across groups. Path analyses showed sexual minorities’ poorer psychological well-being was mediated by their greater COVID-19 worry and social distancing, in particular. These findings shed light on the distinct impact of COVID-19 on sexual minorities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00918369.2020.1868190

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baumel, K., Hamlett, M., Wheeler, B., Hall, D., Randall, A. K., & Mickelson, K.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Deborah
Venue
Journal of Homosexuality
Published
2021-02-01
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
673-691
ISSN
  • 0091-8369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-3602
OpenAlex
W3128661764
Cited by
41
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Homosexuality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
funding
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, sexual minorities, psychological well-being, social distancing, computer-mediated communication, minority stress, psychological distress, thriving, COVID-19 worry, heterosexuals, health disparities
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Physical Distancing, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Heterosexuality, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review