Cited by 485Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorPhonetics and Phonology ResearchVoice and Speech Disorders

The Neural Control of Vocalization in Mammals: A Review

Jürgens, U.·2009·Journal of Voice

Abstract

The review describes a model of vocal control, based mainly on research in the squirrel monkey, which consists of two hierarchically organized pathways. One runs from the anterior cingulate cortex via the periaqueductal gray (PAG) into the reticular formation of pons and medulla oblongata, and from there to the phonatory motoneurons. This pathway controls the readiness to vocalize. Although the anterior cingulate cortex in this pathway plays a role in voluntary initiation of vocal behavior, the PAG is involved in vocal gating at a more elementary level. The second pathway runs from the motor cortex via the reticular formation to the phonatory motoneurons and includes two feedback loops providing the motor cortex with preprocessed information needed by the latter to generate the final motor commands. One of these feedback loops involves the basal ganglia and the other the cerebellum. The motor cortex together with its feedback loops is involved in the production of learned vocal patterns. These structures seem to be dispensable, however, for the production of innate vocal patterns, such as the nonverbal emotional vocal utterances of humans and most nonhuman mammalian vocalizations. These innate vocal patterns seem to be generated in the pontine and medullary reticular formation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.07.005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is well-documented evidence for anatomical circuitry underlying specific actions in mammals, such as vocalizations, maternal behavior, freezing, startle, attack, and appetitive behavior.

    “There is well-documented evidence for the anatomical circuitry underlying specific actions such as vocalizations (Jürgens 2009), maternal behavior (e.g., pup retrieval, grooming, nest building, and nursing; Numan 2007), freezing (Fanselow & Poulos 2005), startle (Davis et al. 2008; Lang et al. 2000), attack (Blanchard & Blanchard 2003) and appetitive behavior (Berridge & Kringelbach 2008; Shultz 2”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Jürgens 2009

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jürgens, U.
Affiliations
German Primate Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Jürgens, U.
Venue
Journal of Voice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0892-1997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007159602
Cited by
485
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 32
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Voice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
vocalizations, vocal control, neural pathways, anterior cingulate cortex, periaqueductal gray, reticular formation, motor cortex, basal ganglia, cerebellum, emotional vocalizations, squirrel monkey
MeSH terms
Animals, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Motivation, Motor Neurons, Neural Pathways, Saimiri, Vocalization, Animal, Sensory Gating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review