Cited by 143Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsVascular anomalies and interventionsRenal and Vascular Pathologies

Gastric exercise tonometry: The key investigation in patients with suspected celiac artery compression syndrome

Open access
Mensink, Peter B.F., van Petersen, Andre S., Kolkman, Jeroen J., Otte, Johannes A., Huisman, Ad B., Geelkerken, Robert H.·2006·Journal of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Introduction Controversy continues about the mere existence of the celiac artery compression syndrome. Earlier results of treatment of unselected patients groups showed varying, mostly disappointing, results. The recently introduced gastric exercise tonometry test is able to identify patients with actual gastrointestinal ischemia. We prospectively studied the use of gastric exercise tonometry as a key criterion for revascularization treatment in patients with otherwise unexplained abdominal complaints and significant stenosis of the celiac artery by compression of the arcuate ligament. Methods Patients were prospectively selected using abdominal artery angiography and gastric exercise tonometry. Patients with a significant compression of the celiac artery, typical abdominal complaints, and abnormal tonometry were considered for revascularization. Results Over a 7-year period, 43 patients with significant celiac artery compression were included in this study, and 30 patients were diagnosed as ischemic. Twenty-nine patients had revascularization, 22 (76 %) had a trunk release only. After a median follow-up of 39 months, 83% of patients were free of symptoms. The repeated tonometry after treatment improved in 100% of patients free of symptoms, compared with 25% in patients with persistent complaints after revascularization. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that the celiac axis compression syndrome exists and that the actual ischemia can be detected by gastric exercise tonometry and treated safely, with success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.038

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mensink, P. B. F., van Petersen, A. S., Kolkman, J. J., Otte, J. A., Huisman, A. B., & Geelkerken, R. H.
Affiliations
Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL)
Venue
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
277-281
ISSN
0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016521100
Cited by
143
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Keywords
celiac artery compression, celiac artery stenosis, gastrointestinal ischemia, revascularization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Celiac Artery, Constriction, Pathologic, Decision Trees, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Manometry, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Splanchnic Circulation, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Angiography, Digital Subtraction, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review