The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION Ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (rDTAA) is associated with high mortality rates. Data supporting endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) to reduce mortality compared with open repair are limited to small series. We investigated published reports for contemporary outcomes of open and endovascular repair of rDTAA. METHODS We systematically reviewed all studies describing the outcomes of rDTAA treated with open repair or TEVAR since 1995 using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library CENTRAL, and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) databases. Case reports or studies published before 1995 were excluded. All articles were critically appraised for relevance, validity, and availability of data regarding treatment outcomes. All data were systematically pooled, and meta-analyses were performed to investigate 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and paraplegia rates after both types of repair. RESULTS Original data of 224 patients (70% male) with rDTAA were identified: 143 (64%) were treated with TEVAR and 81 (36%) with open repair. Mean age was 70 +/- 5.6 years. The 30-day mortality was 19% for patients treated with TEVAR for rDTAA compared 33% for patients treated with open repair, which was significant (odds ratio [OR], 2.15, P = .016). The 30-day occurrence rates of myocardial infarction (11.1% vs 3.5%; OR, 3.70, P < .05), stroke (10.2% vs 4.1%; OR, 2.67; P = .117), and paraplegia (5.5% vs 3.1%; OR, 1.83; P = .405) were increased after open repair vs TEVAR, but this failed to reach statistical significance for stroke and paraplegia. Five additional patients in the TEVAR group died of aneurysm-related causes after 30 days, during a median follow-up of 17 +/- 10 months. Follow-up data after open repair were insufficient. The estimated aneurysm-related survival at 3 years after TEVAR was 70.6%. CONCLUSION Endovascular repair of rDTAA is associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate compared with open surgical repair. TEVAR was associated with a considerable number of aneurysm-related deaths during follow-up.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Erbel (2014) · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 · Cited by 4,451
Isselbacher, E. M., Preventza, O., Hamilton Black, J., Augoustides, J. G., Beck, A. W., Bolen, M. A., Braverman, A. C., Bray, B. E., Brown-Zimmerman, M. M., Chen, E. P., et al. (2022) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001106 · Cited by 2,082
Editor's Choice – Management of Descending Thoracic Aorta Diseases
Riambau, V., Böckler, D., Brunkwall, J., Cao, P., Chiesa, R., Coppi, G., Czerny, M., Fraedrich, G., Haulon, S., Jacobs, M. J., et al. (2017) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.06.005 · Cited by 1,246
Self-citationePTFE‐based biomedical devices: An overview of surgical efficiency
Roina, Y., Auber, F., Hocquet, D., & Herlem, G. (2022) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34928 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Jonker, F. H. W., Trimarchi, S., Verhagen, H. J. M., Moll, F. L., Sumpio, B. E., & Muhs, B. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1026-1032.e2
- ISSN
- 0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019272962
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.103
- The paper
- Jonker, F. H. W., Trimarchi, S., Verhagen, H. J. M., Moll, F. L., Sumpio, B. E., & Muhs, B. E. (2010). Meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Journal of Vascular Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.