Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 151International Student and Expatriate ChallengesHuman Resource and Talent ManagementInternational Business and FDI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Balancing individual and organizational goals in global talent management: A mutual-benefits perspective

Open access
Farndale, Elaine, Pai, Avinash, Sparrow, Paul, Scullion, Hugh·2014·Journal of World Business
DOI 10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Drawing from the talent management and global mobility literatures, there is simultaneous pressure to address both organizational goals to place talent internationally, and individual goals of self-initiated expatriation. This raises important questions for the future of global talent management (GTM): how might individual and organizational goals be balanced to the mutual benefit of both parties? Qualitative data from pilot studies in multinational corporations demonstrate a largely financially driven balancing act between self-initiated and organization-assigned expatriate assignments. Building primarily from psychological contract theory, this study builds propositions for future research, and explores the implications for global talent management practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.004

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Collings, 2012, Global staffing: A critical review, 141
  2. Javidan, 2010, Managing yourself: Making it overseas, Harvard Business Review, 88, 109
  3. Neal, 2007, Action learning accelerates innovation: Cisco's action learning forum, Organizational Developmental Journal, 25, 107

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Farndale, E., Pai, A., Sparrow, P., & Scullion, H.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Corresponding author
Farndale, Elaine
ORCID
Venue
Journal of World Business
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
204-214
ISSN
1090-9516 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.004
OpenAlex
W2115748661
Cited by
151
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 3
FWCI
33.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of World Business (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
Keywords
global talent management, self-initiated expatriation, international assignments, psychological contract theory, multinational corporations, global mobility, financial incentives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.