The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generational challenges to talent management: A framework for talent retention based on the psychological-contract perspective
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
When Employees Feel Betrayed: A Model of How Psychological Contract Violation Develops
Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259230 · Cited by 3,003
Psychological and implied contracts in organizations
Rousseau, D. M. (1989) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/bf01384942 · Cited by 2,560
Looking inside for competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (1995) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.1995.9512032192 · Cited by 2,141
Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda
Collings, D. G., & Mellahi, K. (2009) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.04.001 · Cited by 1,837 · cited 3×
“Compared to other human resources, they are supposed to be key strategic resources (Collings & Mellahi, 2009; Schuler & Tarique, 2012) because they have a most important impact on organizational performance (Collings & Mellahi, 2009; Tansley et al., 2007) and on creating competitive advantages for…”
BackgroundRousseau, D. M. (1990) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030110506 · Cited by 1,811
Generational differences: revisiting generational work values for the new millennium
Wey Smola, K., & Sutton, C. D. (2002) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.147 · Cited by 1,657
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309352246 · Cited by 1,626
Talent management: A critical review
Lewis, R. E., & Heckman, R. J. (2006) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.001 · Cited by 1,341
Cited by
Talent management and employee engagement – a meta-analysis of their impact on talent retention
Pandita, D., & Ray, S. (2018) · Industrial and Commercial Training · doi:10.1108/ict-09-2017-0073 · Cited by 293
Liu, Y., Chan, C., Zhao, C., & Liu, C. (2019) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-07-2017-0260 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Festing, M., & Schäfer, L.
- Venue
- Journal of World Business
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 262-271
- ISSN
- 1090-9516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044675555
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 26.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generational challenges to talent management: A framework for talent retention based on the psychological-contract perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.010
- The paper
- Festing, M., & Schäfer, L. (2014). Generational challenges to talent management: A framework for talent retention based on the psychological-contract perspective. Journal of World Business. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
