The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EmoSenticSpace: A novel framework for affective common-sense reasoning
Abstract
Emotions play a key role in natural language understanding and sensemaking. Pure machine learning usually fails to recognize and interpret emotions in text accurately. The need for knowledge bases that give access to semantics and sentics (the conceptual and affective information) associated with natural language is growing exponentially in the context of big social data analysis. To this end, this paper proposes EmoSenticSpace, a new framework for affective common-sense reasoning that extends WordNet-Affect and SenticNet by providing both emotion labels and polarity scores for a large set of natural language concepts. The framework is built by means of fuzzy c-means clustering and support-vector-machine classification, and takes into account a number of similarity measures, including point-wise mutual information and emotional affinity. EmoSenticSpace was tested on three emotion-related natural language processing tasks, namely sentiment analysis, emotion recognition, and personality detection. In all cases, the proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art. In particular, the direct evaluation of EmoSenticSpace against psychological features provided in the benchmark ISEAR dataset shows a 92.15% agreement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WordNet: a lexical database for English
Miller, G. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219717.219748 · Cited by 14,015
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
What are emotions? And how can they be measured?
Scherer, K. R. (2005) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018405058216 · Cited by 4,264
Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text
Mairesse, F., Walker, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Moore, R. K. (2007) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2349 · Cited by 1,046
Cited by
A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications
Ravi, K., & Ravi, V. (2015) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015 · Cited by 1,306
A review on sentiment analysis and emotion detection from text
Nandwani, P., & Verma, R. (2021) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-021-00776-6 · Cited by 869
Fusing audio, visual and textual clues for sentiment analysis from multimodal content
Poria, S., Cambria, E., Howard, N., Huang, G.-B., & Hussain, A. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.01.095 · Cited by 534
Self-citationPoria, S., Cambria, E., & Gelbukh, A. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1303 · Cited by 533
Self-citationText‐based emotion detection: Advances, challenges, and opportunities
Acheampong, F. A., Wenyu, C., & Nunoo‐Mensah, H. (2020) · Engineering Reports · doi:10.1002/eng2.12189 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Cambria, E., Hussain, A., & Huang, G.-B.
- Venue
- Knowledge-Based Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 69
- Pages
- 108-123
- ISSN
- 0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165938099
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EmoSenticSpace: A novel framework for affective common-sense reasoning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.06.011
- The paper
- Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Cambria, E., Hussain, A., & Huang, G.-B. (2014). EmoSenticSpace: A novel framework for affective common-sense reasoning. Knowledge-Based Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.06.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.