Cited by 4,264Emotions and Moral BehaviorEmotion and Mood RecognitionAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

What are emotions? And how can they be measured?

Open access
Scherer, Klaus R.·2005·Social Science Information

Abstract

Defining “emotion” is a notorious problem. Without consensual conceptualization and operationalization of exactly what phenomenon is to be studied, progress in theory and research is difficult to achieve and fruitless debates are likely to proliferate. A particularly unfortunate example is William James’s asking the question “What is an emotion?” when he really meant “feeling”, a misnomer that started a debate which is still ongoing, more than a century later. This contribution attempts to sensitize researchers in the social and behavioral sciences to the importance of definitional issues and their consequences for distinguishing related but fundamentally different affective processes, states, and traits. Links between scientific and folk concepts of emotion are explored and ways to measure emotion and its components are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0539018405058216

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motives and their states of action readiness (including autonomic responses) are elicited by events as these are appraised in a fraction of a second.

    “Motives and their states of action readiness (including autonomic responses) are elicited by events as these are appraised in a fraction of a second (Scherer, 2005; Frijda, 2007).”

    From Impulsive action: emotional impulses and their control (2014) · cites this paper as Scherer, 2005

  • The most central appraisal is whether an event is appraised to promote or obstruct one or more of the person's goals, needs, values, or more generally concerns.

    “The most central appraisal is whether an event is appraised to promote or obstruct one or more of the person’s goals, needs, values, or more generally concerns (Ellsworth and Scherer, 2003; Scherer, 2005; Frijda, 2007).”

    From Impulsive action: emotional impulses and their control (2014) · cites this paper as Scherer, 2005

  • Real-life emergency situations are suggested to evoke acute stress responses to facilitate remedial action.

    “Real-life emergency situations are suggested to evoke acute stress responses to facilitate remedial action (Scherer, 2005; Kreibig, 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scherer, K. R.
Corresponding author
Scherer, Klaus R.
Venue
Social Science Information
Published
2005-12
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
695-729
ISSN
  • 0539-0184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7412
OpenAlex
W2102998034
Cited by
4,264
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 283 · 2025: 258 · 2024: 271 · 2023: 299 · 2022: 338 · 2021: 348 · 2020: 280 · 2019: 308 · 2018: 263 · 2017: 248 · 2016: 272 · 2015: 248 · 2014: 210 · 2013: 186 · 2012: 158
FWCI
24.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science Information (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
emotions, definition of emotion, emotion measurement, emotional processing, affective states, emotional characteristics, conceptualization and operationalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review