Cited by 41Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataMachine Learning and Data Classification

Label noise analysis meets adversarial training: A defense against label poisoning in federated learning

Hallaji, Ehsan, Razavi-Far, Roozbeh, Saif, Mehrdad, Herrera-Viedma, Enrique·2023·Knowledge-Based Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110384

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hallaji, E., Razavi-Far, R., Saif, M., & Herrera-Viedma, E.
Affiliations
University of Windsor (CA)
Venue
Knowledge-Based Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
266
Pages
110384
ISSN
0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4320717670
Cited by
41
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (CGSD3-569341-2022, RGPIN-04002-2018, RGPIN-2021-02968)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
federated learning, adversarial training, backdoor attacks, label-flipping attacks, generative adversarial training, poisoning defense, intrusion detection, Internet of Things

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review