Cited by 18Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionGait Recognition and Analysis

A spatio-temporal graph neural network for fall prediction with inertial sensors

Wang, Shu, Li, Xiaohu, Liao, Guorui, Liu, Jiawei, Liao, Changbo, Liu, Ming, Liao, Jun, Liu, Li·2024·Knowledge-Based Systems

Abstract

Falls are the leading cause of unintentional human injury , having become a public health event of strong social concern. The fall prediction technology based on wearable inertial sensors is a relatively reliable solution in human activity monitoring, a user scenario with mobility and high information privacy sensitivity, and has the advantages of low cost, small size, and high precision. However, a key challenge in sensor-based fall prediction is the fact that a fall event can often occur in various configurations of fall poses together with their own spatio-temporal dependencies. This leads us to define a spatio-temporal model to explicitly characterize these internal configurations of poses. In particular, we introduce a graph neural network with spatio-temporal topological structure to encode such latent relations among poses by capturing representative patterns in fall events. Moreover, a human body orientation estimator is devised to represent human low limbs information and as a result, separate pose dependencies are globally consistent. Empirical evaluations on two benchmark datasets and one in-house dataset suggest our approach significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111709

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S., Li, X., Liao, G., Liu, J., Liao, C., Liu, M., Liao, J., & Liu, L.
Affiliations
  • Southwest University (CN)
  • Chongqing University (CN)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Li
Venue
Knowledge-Based Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
293
Pages
111709
ISSN
0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393167082
Cited by
18
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality (CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1256)
  • Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62207007, 62377040, 61977012, 61977054)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
fall risk prediction, wearable inertial sensors, spatio-temporal graph neural networks, human activity monitoring, spatiotemporal dependencies, fall detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review