Event Prediction in the Big Data Era: A Systematic Survey
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Events are occurrences in specific locations, time, and semantics that nontrivially impact either our society or the nature, such as earthquakes, civil unrest, system failures, pandemics, and crimes. It is highly desirable to be able to anticipate the occurrence of such events in advance to reduce the potential social upheaval and damage caused. Event prediction, which has traditionally been prohibitively challenging, is now becoming a viable option in the big data era and is thus experiencing rapid growth, also thanks to advances in high performance computers and new Artificial Intelligence techniques. There is a large amount of existing work that focuses on addressing the challenges involved, including heterogeneous multi-faceted outputs, complex (e.g., spatial, temporal, and semantic) dependencies, and streaming data feeds. Due to the strong interdisciplinary nature of event prediction problems, most existing event prediction methods were initially designed to deal with specific application domains, though the techniques and evaluation procedures utilized are usually generalizable across different domains. However, it is imperative yet difficult to cross-reference the techniques across different domains, given the absence of a comprehensive literature survey for event prediction. This article aims to provide a systematic and comprehensive survey of the technologies, applications, and evaluations of event prediction in the big data era. First, systematic categorization and summary of existing techniques are presented, which facilitate domain experts’ searches for suitable techniques and help model developers consolidate their research at the frontiers. Then, comprehensive categorization and summary of major application domains are provided to introduce wider applications to model developers to help them expand the impacts of their research. Evaluation metrics and procedures are summarized and standardized to unify the understanding of model performance among stakeholders, model developers, and domain experts in various application domains. Finally, open problems and future directions are discussed. Additional resources related to event prediction are included in the paper website: http://cs.emory.edu/∼lzhao41/projects/event_prediction_site.html.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-domain Image-to-Image Translation
Choi, Y., Choi, M., Kim, M., Ha, J.-W., Kim, S., & Choo, J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00916 · Cited by 4,163 · see citing works
Letham, B., Rudin, C., McCormick, T. H., & Madigan, D. (2015) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aoas848 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Neural Speech Recognizer: Acoustic-to-Word LSTM Model for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition
Soltau, H., Liao, H., & Sak, H. (2017) · Interspeech 2017 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2017-1566 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Forecasting Civil Wars: Theory and Structure in an Age of “Big Data” and Machine Learning
Blair, R. A., & Sambanis, N. (2020) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002720918923 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Forecasting occurrences of activities
Minor, B., & Cook, D. J. (2017) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.09.010 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These are then used to directly predict the integer-valued index of future time windows of the event occurrence using (auto)regression [126, 131] and time series methods such as ARIMA [162], or ordinal values of future time scales using ordinal regression or classification [172].”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A spatio-temporal graph neural network for fall prediction with inertial sensors
Wang, S., Li, X., Liao, G., Liu, J., Liao, C., Liu, M., Liao, J., & Liu, L. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111709 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhao, L.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Liang
- ORCID
- Zhao, Liang
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2021-05-25
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1-37
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W3164101172
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2007976; 2007716; 1942594; 1755850; 1841520; 1907805)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Seismology and Earthquake Studies
- Keywords
- event prediction, big data, natural disasters, civil unrest, system failure, pandemic, crime prediction, spatiotemporal dependencies, data streams, evaluation metrics, domain generalization, literature survey
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review