Health Equity, Schooling Hesitancy, and the Social Determinants of Learning
Open accessAbstract
At least 62 million K-12 students in North America-disproportionately low-income children of color- have been physically out of school for over a year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These children are at risk of significant academic, social, mental, and physical harm now and in the long-term. We review the literature about school safety and the conditions that shape families' and teachers' choices to return to in-person schooling. We identify four causes of schooling hesitancy in the U.S. even where schools can be safely reopened: high community transmission rates; the politicization of school re-openings; long-term racialized disinvestment in urban districts; and parents' rational calculations about their family's vulnerability due to the social determinants of health. Given the deep interconnections between the social determinants of health and of learning, and between schooling hesitancy and community vulnerability, stark inequities in in-person schooling access and take-up are likely to persist. We recommend that school districts invest in scientifically-based facilities upgrades, increased nursing and counseling staffing, and preparation for schools to serve as pediatric vaccination sites. School districts should also apply lessons from public health about addressing vaccine hesitancy to the challenge of schooling hesitancy by investing time in humble listening to parents and teachers about their concerns.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Black (66%) and Hispanic (64%) students were almost twice as likely as White (34%) students to be learning fully remotely, and twice as likely as remote White students to have no live access to a teacher.
“Black (66%) and Hispanic (64%) students were almost twice as likely as White (34%) students to be learning fully remotely, and were also twice as likely as White students who were also remote to have no live access to a teacher.”
From The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as [311]
As of Dec 2020, 64% of low-income US students attended school solely via computer, compared with 48% of high-income students.
“As of December, 2020, 64% of low-income students in the United States were attending school solely via computer, compared with 48% of high-income students.”
From The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as [311]
Across the US and Mexico, at least 62 million school-age children aged 5-18 were physically out of school for at least 13 months continuously.
“Across the United States and Mexico, at least 62 million elementary-age and secondary-school-age children (aged 5–18 years) were physically out of school for at least 13 months continuously.”
From The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as [311]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Leeb, R. T., Bitsko, R. H., Radhakrishnan, L., Martinez, P., Njai, R., & Holland, K. M. (2020) · MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6945a3 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Household COVID-19 risk and in-person schooling
Lessler, J., Grabowski, M. K., Grantz, K. H., Badillo-Goicoechea, E., Metcalf, C. J. E., Lupton-Smith, C., Azman, A. S., & Stuart, E. A. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abh2939 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Indoor air changes and potential implications for SARS-CoV-2 transmission
Allen, J. G., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.5053 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic
Sachs, J. D., Karim, S. S. A., Aknin, L., Allen, J., Brosbøl, K., Colombo, F., Barron, G. C., Espinosa, M. F., Gaspar, V., Gaviria, A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01585-9 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Levinson, M., Geller, A. C., & Allen, J. G.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Levinson, Meira
- Venue
- The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 100032
- ISSN
- 2667-193X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9790768
- OpenAlex
- W3159919620
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Regional Health - Americas (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- EdWorkingPapers.com
- Funders
- Brown University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, school closures, social determinants of health, health equity, school safety, school reopening, urban school districts, vaccine hesitancy, childhood immunization, community transmission
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review