The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: The impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such semantic di erential scale has been recommended for evaluative approaches [30].”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Among the body of literature available regarding the perception of landscape changes [30-32], few studies include the concept of ES explicitly [33].”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“While there is a growing body of scientific work being carried out on ES perceptions and values, this seems disconnected from the field of locals' perceptions of agricultural landscape changes.”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203029053 · Cited by 23,962
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) · Cited by 9,433
Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response
Macdonald, D. W., Crabtree, J., Wiesinger, G., Dax, T., Stamou, N., Fleury, P., Lazpita, J. G., & Gibon, A. (2000) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1006/jema.1999.0335 · Cited by 2,040
How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?
Kleijn, D., & Sutherland, W. J. (2003) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00868.x · Cited by 1,505
Statistics: an introduction using R
Crawley, M. J. (2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-1618 · Cited by 1,253
The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?
Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. L. A. (2007) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x · Cited by 994
Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century
Daniel, T. C. (2001) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00141-4 · Cited by 989
Lothian, A. (1999) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(99)00019-5 · Cited by 544
Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure
Dramstad, W., Tveit, M. S., Fjellstad, W. J., & Fry, G. L. A. (2006) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006 · Cited by 494
Farmland Biodiversity and the Footprint of Agriculture
Butler, S. J., Vickery, J. A., & Norris, K. J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136607 · Cited by 452
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Nassauer, 1983, Framing the landscape in photographic simulation, J. Environ. Manage., 17, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Visual preferences for wind turbines: Location, numbers and respondent characteristics
Janečková, K., Sklenička, P., Stiborek, J., Svobodová, K., Šálek, M., & Brabec, E. (2011) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.001 · Cited by 221
Yoshimura, N., & Hiura, T. (2017) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.009 · Cited by 214
Carneiro, M. J., Lima, J., & Silva, A. L. (2015) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2015.1037840 · Cited by 195
Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland
Junge, X., Schüpbach, B., Walter, T., Schmid, B., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010 · Cited by 177
Fontana, V., Radtke, A., Fedrigotti, V. B., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., Zerbe, S., & Buchholz, T. S. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.007 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindemann-Matthies, P., Briegel, R., Schüpbach, B., & Junge, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- ORCID
- Junge, Xenia
- Venue
- Landscape and Urban Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-109
- ISSN
- 0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013385769
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
- Keywords
- scenic beauty, aesthetic preference, alpine landscape, agricultural land use, agrobiodiversity, ecological compensation areas, agri-environmental schemes, grassland management intensity, arable land, hedges, landscape attractiveness, tourism, recreation, Swiss Alps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
