CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 177Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban and spatial planningEconomic and Environmental Valuation

Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland

Open access
Junge, Xenia, Schüpbach, Beatrice, Walter, Thomas, Schmid, Bernhard, Lindemann-Matthies, Petra·2015·Landscape and Urban Planning
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among the body of literature on perception of landscape changes, few studies include the concept of ES explicitly.

    “Among the body of literature available regarding the perception of landscape changes [30-32], few studies include the concept of ES explicitly [33].”

    From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction explicitly calls landscape aesthetics an ecosystem service, and the paper studies perceptions of seasonal landscape changes. The Discussion says few studies have examined seasonal effects on landscape perception, but it does not establish that few landscape-change perception studies explicitly include the concept of ecosystem services. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • There is a growing body of scientific work on ES perceptions and values, but it seems disconnected from the field of locals' perceptions of agricultural landscape changes.

    “While there is a growing body of scientific work being carried out on ES perceptions and values, this seems disconnected from the field of locals' perceptions of agricultural landscape changes.”

    From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction describes recent research on how people value agricultural landscapes and identifies landscape aesthetics as an ecosystem service. It identifies gaps in studies of individual landscape elements and seasonal preferences, but does not say that ecosystem-service research is disconnected from research on locals’ perceptions of agricultural landscape changes. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The approach follows a wide body of studies that successfully assessed people's judgments using manipulated photos as a surrogate for the actual landscape.

    “This approach follows a wide body of studies that successfully assessed people's judgments using manipulated photos as a surrogate for the actual landscape [22,31-33,46].”

    From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [23]23. Heerwagen, J. H., & Orians, G. H. (1993). Humans, habitats, and aesthetics. In S. R. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 138-172). Washington D.C. - Island Press.
  2. [35]35. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature. A psychological perspective. New York - Cambridge University Press.
  3. [70]70. Ulrich, S. R. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In S. R. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73-137). Washington D.C. - Island Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Junge, X., Schüpbach, B., Walter, T., Schmid, B., & Lindemann-Matthies, P.
Affiliations
  • Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH)
  • Agroscope (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Junge, Xenia
ORCID
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
133
Pages
67-77
ISSN
0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010
OpenAlex
W1975294410
Cited by
177
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Swiss Federal Office of Agriculture
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
seasonal variation, ecological compensation areas, landscape elements, multifunctional agriculture, biodiversity, vertical structure, flowering stage, perceived naturalness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review