Cited by 189Urban and spatial planningLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesAgricultural Economics and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: The impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity

Lindemann-Matthies, Petra, Briegel, Reinhold, Schüpbach, Beatrice, Junge, Xenia·2010·Landscape and Urban Planning

DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.015

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.015

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Research Methods in Education
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203029053 · Cited by 23,962
The Measurement of Meaning
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) · Cited by 9,433
Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response
Macdonald, D. W., Crabtree, J., Wiesinger, G., Dax, T., Stamou, N., Fleury, P., Lazpita, J. G., & Gibon, A. (2000) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1006/jema.1999.0335 · Cited by 2,040
How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?
Kleijn, D., & Sutherland, W. J. (2003) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00868.x · Cited by 1,505
Statistics: an introduction using R
Crawley, M. J. (2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-1618 · Cited by 1,253
The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?
Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. L. A. (2007) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x · Cited by 994
Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century
Daniel, T. C. (2001) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00141-4 · Cited by 989
Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder?
Lothian, A. (1999) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(99)00019-5 · Cited by 544
Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure
Dramstad, W., Tveit, M. S., Fjellstad, W. J., & Fry, G. L. A. (2006) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006 · Cited by 494
Farmland Biodiversity and the Footprint of Agriculture
Butler, S. J., Vickery, J. A., & Norris, K. J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136607 · Cited by 452

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Nassauer, 1983, Framing the landscape in photographic simulation, J. Environ. Manage., 17, 1

Sorted by citations

Visual preferences for wind turbines: Location, numbers and respondent characteristics
Janečková, K., Sklenička, P., Stiborek, J., Svobodová, K., Šálek, M., & Brabec, E. (2011) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.001 · Cited by 221
Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: Use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido
Yoshimura, N., & Hiura, T. (2017) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.009 · Cited by 214
Landscape and the rural tourism experience: identifying key elements, addressing potential, and implications for the future
Carneiro, M. J., Lima, J., & Silva, A. L. (2015) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2015.1037840 · Cited by 195
Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland
Junge, X., Schüpbach, B., Walter, T., Schmid, B., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010 · Cited by 177
Comparing land-use alternatives: Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis
Fontana, V., Radtke, A., Fedrigotti, V. B., Tappeiner, U., Tasser, E., Zerbe, S., & Buchholz, T. S. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.007 · Cited by 169
Beautiful agricultural landscapes promote cultural ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation
Assandri, G., Bogliani, G., Pedrini, P., & Brambilla, M. (2018) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.012 · Cited by 169
What accounts for 'England's green and pleasant land'?: a panel data analysis of mental health and land cover types in rural England
Alcock, I., White, M., Lovell, R., Higgins, S., Osborne, N., Husk, K., & Wheeler, B. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.008 · Cited by 129
Mitigating the impacts of the decline of traditional farming on mountain landscapes and biodiversity: a case study in the European Alps
Marini, L., Klimek, S., & Battisti, A. (2011) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.003 · Cited by 140
Ecosystem services in peri-urban landscapes: The effects of agricultural landscape change on ecosystem services in Taiwan's western coastal plain
Lee, Y.-C., Ahern, J. F., & Yeh, C.-T. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.023 · Cited by 138
Demographic groups’ differences in visual preference for vegetated landscapes in urban green space
Wang, R., & Zhao, J. (2016) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.10.010 · Cited by 129
Unpacking the People–Biodiversity Paradox: A Conceptual Framework
Pett, T. J., Shwartz, A., Irvine, K. N., Dallimer, M., & Davies, Z. G. (2016) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biw036 · Cited by 118
Visual preferences for physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents
Svobodová, K., Sklenička, P., Janečková, K., & Šálek, M. (2011) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.007 · Cited by 118
Shades of grey challenge practical application of the cultural ecosystem services concept
Blicharska, M., SMITHERS, R. J., Hedblom, M., Hedenås, H., Mikusiński, G., Pedersen, E., Sandström, P., & Svensson, J. S. (2016) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.014 · Cited by 115
Environmental heterogeneity as a bridge between ecosystem service and visual quality objectives in management, planning and design
Dronova, I. (2017) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.005 · Cited by 125
Themes and trends in visual assessment research: Introduction to the Landscape and Urban Planning special collection on the visual assessment of landscapes
Gobster, P. H., Ribe, R. G., & Palmer, J. F. (2019) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103635 · Cited by 110
Visual preference of trees: The effects of tree attributes and seasons
Zhao, J., Xu, W., & Li, R. (2017) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.04.015 · Cited by 101
Spatial assessment of aesthetic services in a complex mountain region: combining visual landscape properties with crowdsourced geographic information
Tenerelli, P., Püffel, C., & Luque, S. S. (2017) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0498-7 · Cited by 97
Does urban gardening increase aesthetic quality of urban areas? A case study from Germany
Lindemann‐Matthies, P., & Brieger, H. (2016) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.010 · Cited by 96
Audio-visual interaction and visitor characteristics affect perceived soundscape restorativeness: Case study in five parks in China
Guo, X., Liu, J., Albert, C., & Hong, X. C. (2022) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127738 · Cited by 93
Digital Technologies for Sustainable Tourism Destinations: State of the Art and Research Agenda
Archi, Y. E., Benbba, B., Kabil, M., & Dávid, L. D. (2023) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci13080184 · Cited by 135
Factors influencing visual landscape quality perceived by the public. Results from a national survey
Wartmann, F. M., Frick, J., Kienast, F., & Hunziker, M. (2021) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.104024 · Cited by 91
99 volumes later: We can visualise. Now what?
Lange, E. (2011) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.016 · Cited by 90
How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions?
Dendoncker, N., Boeraeve, F., Crouzat, E., Dufrêne, M., König, A., & Barnaud, C. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09843-230112 · Cited by 88
Research in tourism sustainability: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis from 1990 to 2022
de Bruyn, C. O., Said, F. B., Meyer, N., & Soliman, M. S. A. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18874 · Cited by 88
Comparing effectiveness and return on investment of action‐ and results‐based agri‐environmental payments in S witzerland
Wuepper, D., & Huber, R. (2021) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/ajae.12284 · Cited by 87
Future of Mountain Agriculture in the Alps
Flury, C., Huber, R., & Tasser, E. (2012) · Springer geography · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33584-6_8 · Cited by 81
Economic valuation of cultural ecosystem service changes to a landscape in the Swiss Alps
Rewitzer, S., Huber, R., Grêt‐Regamey, A., & Barkmann, J. (2017) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.014 · Cited by 84
A guide to assess and value ecosystem services of grasslands
Richter, F. J., Jan, P., Benni, N. E., LÜSCHER, A., Buchmann, N., & Klaus, V. H. (2021) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101376 · Cited by 79
Effects of past landscape changes on aesthetic landscape values in the European Alps
Schirpke, U., Zoderer, B. M., Tappeiner, U., & Tasser, E. (2021) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104109 · Cited by 80
Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania
Kalinauskas, M., Mikša, K., Inácio, M., Gomes, E., & Pereira, P. A. D. S. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112239 · Cited by 69
Relating landscape ecological metrics with public survey data on perceived landscape quality and place attachment
Wartmann, F. M., Stride, C., Kienast, F., & Hunziker, M. (2021) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-021-01290-y · Cited by 75
Correlations between aesthetic preferences of river and landscape characters
Zhao, J., Luo, P., Wang, R., & Cai, Y. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management · doi:10.3846/16486897.2012.695738 · Cited by 68
Assessment of spatial variability of multiple ecosystem services in grasslands of different intensities
Clec’h, S. L., Finger, R., Buchmann, N., Gosal, A. S., Hörtnagl, L. J., Huguenin‐Elie, O., Jeanneret, P., LÜSCHER, A., Schneider, M. K., & Huber, R. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109372 · Cited by 68
Using conjoint analysis to gain deeper insights into aesthetic landscape preferences
Schirpke, U., Tappeiner, G., Tasser, E., & Tappeiner, U. (2018) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.001 · Cited by 68
What plant traits tell us: Consequences of land-use change of a traditional agro-forest system on biodiversity and ecosystem service provision
Fontana, V., Radtke, A., Walde, J. F., Tasser, E., Wilhalm, T., Zerbe, S., & Tappeiner, U. (2014) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.01.006 · Cited by 65
A good sound in the right place: Exploring the effects of auditory-visual combinations on aesthetic preference
Wang, R., & Zhao, J. (2019) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2019.05.018 · Cited by 63
How do urban park features affect cultural ecosystem services: Quantified evidence for design practices
Wang, Y., Shi, X., Cheng, K., Zhang, J., & Chang, Q. (2022) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127713 · Cited by 63
Tourists’ aesthetic assessment of environmental changes, linking conservation planning to sustainable tourism development
Le, D., Scott, N., Becken, S., & Connolly, R. M. (2019) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2019.1632869 · Cited by 62
Toward the next Common Agricultural Policy reform: Determinants of avian communities in hay meadows reveal current policy's inadequacy for biodiversity conservation in grassland ecosystems
Assandri, G., Bogliani, G., Pedrini, P., & Brambilla, M. (2019) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13332 · Cited by 60
The influence of plant species richness on stress recovery of humans
Lindemann‐Matthies, P., & Matthies, D. (2018) · Web Ecology · doi:10.5194/we-18-121-2018 · Cited by 58
Psychographic profile affects willingness to pay for ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean high nature value farmland
Rodríguez-Ortega, T., Bernués, A., & Alfnes, F. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.002 · Cited by 54
Social impacts of biodiversity offsetting: A review
Tupala, A., Huttunen, S., & Halme, P. (2022) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109431 · Cited by 53
Landscape perception: linking physical monitoring data to perceived landscape properties
Hedblom, M., Hedenås, H., Blicharska, M., Adler, S., Knez, I., Mikusiński, G., Svensson, J. S., Sandström, S., Sandström, P., & Wardle, D. A. (2019) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1611751 · Cited by 57
From preference to landscape sustainability: a bibliometric review of landscape preference research from 1968 to 2019
Yang, G., Yu, Z., Zhang, J., & Kristensen, L. S. (2021) · Ecosystem Health and Sustainability · doi:10.1080/20964129.2021.1948355 · Cited by 52
Habitat, climate, topography and management differently affect occurrence in declining avian species: Implications for conservation in changing environments
Brambilla, M., Gustin, M., Cento, M., Ilahiane, L., & Celada, C. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140663 · Cited by 52
Effects of Visual Indicators on Landscape Preferences
Zhao, J., Wang, R., Cai, Y., & Luo, P. (2012) · Journal of Urban Planning and Development · doi:10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000137 · Cited by 52
Can We Model the Scenic Beauty of an Alpine Landscape?
Schirpke, U., Hölzler, S., Leitinger, G., Bacher, M., Tappeiner, U., & Tasser, E. (2013) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su5031080 · Cited by 53
Are path choices of people moving through urban green spaces explained by gender and age? Implications for planning and management
Sang, Å. O., Sang, N., Hedblom, M., Sevelin, G., Knez, I., & Gunnarsson, B. (2020) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126628 · Cited by 48
The effect of landscape type and landscape elements on public visual preferences: ways to use knowledge in the context of landscape planning
Filova, L., Vojar, J., Svobodová, K., & Sklenička, P. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.973481 · Cited by 48
Aesthetic heterogeneity on rural landscape: Pathway discrepancy between perception and cognition
Qi, J., Zhou, Y., Zeng, L., & Tang, X. (2022) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.05.004 · Cited by 46
Human perceptions of cultural ecosystem services of semi-natural grasslands: The influence of plant communities
Nowak, A., Mocior, E., Hibner, J., & Tokarczyk, N. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101208 · Cited by 45
Geographical heterogeneity in mountain grasslands dynamics in the Austrian-Italian Tyrol region
Hinojosa, L., Tasser, E., Rüdisser, J., Leitinger, G., Schermer, M., Lambin, É. F., & Tappeiner, U. (2019) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.03.006 · Cited by 43
A Meta‐analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Cultural Services from Grasslands in Europe
Huber, R., & Finger, R. (2019) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12361 · Cited by 46
Interaction effects of targeted agri-environmental payments on non-marketed goods and services under climate change in a mountain region
Huber, R., Snell, R. S., François, M., Brunner, S. H., Schmatz, D. R., & Finger, R. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.029 · Cited by 45
Legacies, socio-economic and biophysical processes and drivers: the case of future forest cover expansion in the Polish Carpathians and Swiss Alps
Price, B., Kaim, D., Szwagrzyk, M., Ostapowicz, K., Kolecka, N., Schmatz, D. R., Wypych, A., & Kozak, J. (2016) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-016-1079-z · Cited by 41
Application of ecological and aesthetic parameters for riparian quality assessment of a small tropical river in eastern India
Saha, D., Das, D., Dasgupta, R., & Patel, P. P. (2020) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106627 · Cited by 41
How does the representation rate of features in a landscape affect visual preferences? A case study from a post-mining landscape
Svobodová, K., Sklenička, P., & Vojar, J. (2014) · International Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment · doi:10.1080/17480930.2013.873258 · Cited by 39
Landscape and Tourism as Tools for Local Development in Mid-Mountain Rural Areas in the Southeast of Spain (Castilla-La Mancha)
Abellán, F. C., & Martínez, C. G. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10020221 · Cited by 39
Can rural tourism stimulate biodiversity conservation and influence farmer's management decisions?
Weyland, F., Colacci, P., Cardoni, D. A., & Estavillo, C. (2021) · Journal for Nature Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126071 · Cited by 38
Modeling the Visual Landscape: A Review on Approaches, Methods and Techniques
Misthos, L.-M., Krassanakis, V., Merlemis, N., & Kesidis, A. L. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23198135 · Cited by 37
Governing mountain landscapes collectively: local responses to emerging challenges within a systems thinking perspective
Gretter, A., Ciolli, M., & Scolozzi, R. (2018) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1503239 · Cited by 35
Linking ecology and aesthetics in sustainable agricultural landscapes: Lessons from the Palouse region of Washington, U.S.A
Klein, L. R., Hendrix, W. G., Lohr, V. I., Kaytes, J. B., Sayler, R. D., Swanson, M. E., Elliot, W. J., & Reganold, J. P. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.019 · Cited by 37
Landscape persistence and stakeholder perspectives: The case of Romania's Carpathians
Pătru-Stupariu, I., Hossu, C.-A., Stupariu, M., Buttler, A., & Peringer, A. (2015) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.07.015 · Cited by 36
Preferences for urban stream landscapes: Opportunities to promote unmanaged riparian vegetation
Hu, S., Yue, H., & Zhou, Z. (2018) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.12.001 · Cited by 36
Visual ecology: exploring the relationships between ecological quality and aesthetic preference
Zhao, J., Wang, R., Luo, P., Xing, L., & Sun, T. (2016) · Landscape and Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11355-016-0306-6 · Cited by 36
The benefits and disbenefits associated with cultural ecosystem services of urban green spaces
Nowak, A., Działek, J., Hibner, J., Liro, J., Madej, R., Sudmanns, M., & Haase, D. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172092 · Cited by 34
Participative Spatial Scenario Analysis for Alpine Ecosystems
Kohler, M., Stotten, R., Steinbacher, M., Leitinger, G., Tasser, E., Schirpke, U., Tappeiner, U., & Schermer, M. (2017) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0903-7 · Cited by 34
Indicator for a monitoring of Germany’s landscape attractiveness
Walz, U., & Stein, C. (2017) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.052 · Cited by 32
Preserving permanent mountain grasslands in Western Europe: Why are promising approaches not implemented more widely?
Ika Darnhofer, A., Schermer, M., Steinbacher, M., Gabillet, M., & Daugstad, K. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.005 · Cited by 32
Are suburbs perceived as rural villages? Landscape-related residential preferences in Switzerland
Ströbele, M. F., & Hunziker, M. (2017) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.015 · Cited by 30
Quantitative Landscape Assessment Using LiDAR and Rendered 360° Panoramic Images
Wróżyński, R., Pyszny, K., & Sojka, M. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12030386 · Cited by 28
Potential of eye-tracking simulation software for analyzing landscape preferences
Schirpke, U., Tasser, E., & Lavdas, A. Α. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273519 · Cited by 28
Agricultural landscapes between intensification and abandonment: the expectations of the public in a Central-Alpine cross-border region
Pecher, C., Bacher, M., Tasser, E., & Tappeiner, U. (2017) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1315062 · Cited by 28
Are biodiversity perception and attitudes context dependent? A comparative study using a mixed-method approach
Bernardo, F., Ramos, I. L., & Carvalheiro, J. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105703 · Cited by 31
Serviceable tree volume: An alternative tool to assess ecosystem services provided by ornamental trees in urban forests
Lee, L. S. H., Zhang, H., & Jim, C. Y. (2021) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127003 · Cited by 25
The Influence of Place Change on Place Bonding: A Longitudinal Panel Study of Renovated Park Users
Cheng, C.-K., & Chou, S. (2015) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490400.2015.1021883 · Cited by 27
A comparison of in situ and GIS landscape metrics for residential satisfaction modeling
Sahraoui, Y., Youssoufi, S., & Foltête, J. (2016) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.07.011 · Cited by 27
White Spaces Unveiled: Investigating the Restorative Potential of Environmentally Perceived Characteristics in Urban Parks during Winter
Bao, Y., Gao, M., Zhao, C., & Zhou, X. (2023) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f14122329 · Cited by 24
On the relation between landscape beauty and land cover: A case study in the U.K. at Sentinel-2 resolution with interpretable AI
Levering, A., Marcos, D., & Tuia, D. (2021) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.04.020 · Cited by 24
Visual value of rangeland landscapes: A study based on structural equation modeling
Sharafatmandrad, M., & Mashizi, A. K. (2020) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105742 · Cited by 24
Dissecting perceptions of wind energy projects: A laboratory experiment using high-quality audio-visual simulations to analyze experiential versus acceptability ratings and information effects
Ribe, R. G., Manyoky, M., Hayek, U. W., Pieren, R., Heutschi, K., & Grêt‐Regamey, A. (2017) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.08.013 · Cited by 23
Public participation in defining landscape planning scenarios and landscape quality objectives (LQO): Landscape Guidelines for Galicia (NW Spain) case study
Santé, I., Tubio, J. M., & Miranda, D. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104559 · Cited by 24
IS THE RESIDENTIAL LAND USE INCOMPATIBLE WITH CEMETERIES LOCATION? ASSESSING THE ATTITUDES OF URBAN RESIDENTS
Hossu, C.-A., Iojă, C., Hersperger, A. M., & Pătru-Stupariu, I. (2013) · Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences · Cited by 22
The index of the Prognosis Rural Landscape Preferences (IPRLP) as a tool of generalizing peoples’ preferences on rural landscape
Sowińska-Świerkosz, B. N., & Soszyński, D. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109272 · Cited by 22
Effects of Rural Restaurants’ Outdoor Dining Environment Dimensions on Customers’ Satisfaction: A Consumer Perspective
Yang, M., & Luo, S. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10092172 · Cited by 21
Enhancing Attention and Interest in Plants to Mitigate Plant Awareness Disparity
Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12112201 · Cited by 31
Using public participation gis to understand texas coastal communities’ perceptions and preferences for urban green space development in connection to their perceptions of flood risk
Le, T., Kyle, G. T., & Tran, T. D. (2024) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128330 · Cited by 24
Visitors’ preferences for landscape conservation in Alpine environments:Differences across regions, conservation programmes, and socio-economic groups
Getzner, M. (2019) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1677881 · Cited by 20
Farmers’ Perspectives on Cultural Landscapes in Central Switzerland: How Landscape Socialization and Habitus Influence an Aesthetic Appreciation of Landscape
Stotten, R. (2015) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1058995 · Cited by 18
How suitable are discrete choice experiments based on landscape indicators for estimating landscape preferences?
Schirpke, U., Mölk, F. F., Feilhauer, E., Tappeiner, U., & Tappeiner, G. (2023) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104813 · Cited by 18
Contrasting Preference for Grassland Landscapes Among Population Groups in the Central and Southern Great Plains
Becerra, T. A., Engle, D. M., Elmore, R. D., & Fuhlendorf, S. D. (2013) · Rangeland Ecology & Management · doi:10.2111/rem-d-12-00174.1 · Cited by 18
Decoding the Role of Urban Green Space Morphology in Shaping Visual Perception: A Park-Based Study
Peng, Y., Li, Z., Shah, A. M., Lv, B., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Li, X., Song, H., & Chen, Q. (2025) · Land · doi:10.3390/land14030495 · Cited by 18
Spatial Complexity, Visual Complexity and Aesthetics
Papadimitriou, F. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59671-2_16 · Cited by 17
Perception of plant species richness by people with different nationalities—an experimental study
Lindemann‐Matthies, P. (2017) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1305343 · Cited by 15
Wolves' contribution to structural change in grazing systems among swiss alpine summer farms: The evidence from causal random forest
Mink, S., Loginova, D., & Mann, S. (2023) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12540 · Cited by 16
Secondary School Students’ and Their Parents’ Knowledge and Interest in Crop Plants: Why Should We Care?
(2016) · The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education · doi:10.12973/ijese.2015.282a · Cited by 16
Landscape complexity perception and representation in a wine-growing region with the designation of origin in the Loire Valley (France): a cultural ecosystem service?
Hervé, M. E. T., Boudes, P., Cieslik, C., Montembault, D., Jung, V., Burel, F., Cluzeau, D., Winter, S., & Nicolaï, A. (2018) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170518000273 · Cited by 16
A study of demographic difference in external visual preference evaluation of Chinese detached house
Zhen, Z., Ma, M., Shao, Z., Han, C., & Bu, X. (2020) · Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering · doi:10.1080/13467581.2020.1723596 · Cited by 16
Perception of National Park Soundscape and Its Effects on Visual Aesthetics
Wang, P., Zhang, C., Xie, H., Yang, W., & He, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19095721 · Cited by 16
Preference for Grassland Heterogeneity: Implications for Biodiversity in the Great Plains
Becerra, T. A., Engle, D. M., Fuhlendorf, S. D., & Elmore, R. D. (2016) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2016.1239293 · Cited by 16

Authors: Lindemann-Matthies, P., Briegel, R., Schüpbach, B., & Junge, X.
Affiliations: University of Zurich (CH)
ORCID: Junge, Xenia
Venue: Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2010-11
Volume: 98
Issue: 2
Pages: 99-109
ISSN: 0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.015
OpenAlex: W2013385769
Cited by: 189
References: 63
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI: 4.82
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
Keywords: scenic beauty, aesthetic preference, alpine landscape, agricultural land use, agrobiodiversity, ecological compensation areas, agri-environmental schemes, grassland management intensity, arable land, hedges, landscape attractiveness, tourism, recreation, Swiss Alps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: The impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks