Cited by 150Economic and Environmental ValuationLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban and spatial planning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies

van Zanten, Boris T., Verburg, Peter H., Koetse, Mark J., van Beukering, Pieter J.H.·2014·Landscape and Urban Planning

DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
Wooldridge, J. M. (1999) · Cited by 14,354
Case study research: principles and practices
Gerring, J. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1530 · Cited by 4,146
Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation
GEIST, H. J., & LAMBIN, E. F. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:pcaudf]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,123
Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda
Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C. G., Gobster, P. H., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1114773109 · Cited by 1,645
Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
Chan, K. M. A., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S. C., Satterfield, T. A., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R. K., Halpern, B. S., et al. (2012) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7 · Cited by 1,123
The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?
Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. L. A. (2007) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x · Cited by 994
Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming
Zasada, I. (2011) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008 · Cited by 798
Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character
Tveit, M. S., Sang, Å. O., & Fry, G. L. A. (2006) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426390600783269 · Cited by 721
The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature
Brander, L., Florax, R. J. G. M., & Vermaat, J. E. (2006) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4 · Cited by 645
The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: An Assessment
Nelson, J. P., & Kennedy, P. (2008) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-008-9253-5 · Cited by 549

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Van der Zanden, E. H., Levers, C., Verburg, P. H., & Kuemmerle, T. (in review). A European typology of agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning.

Sorted by citations

When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – Five hypotheses
Tscharntke, T., Karp, D. S., Chaplin‐Kramer, R., Batáry, P., DeClerck, F., Gratton, C., Hunt, L. G., Ives, A. R., Jonsson, M., Larsen, A., et al. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.001 · Cited by 661
Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods
Scholte, S. S. K., Teeffelen, A. J. A. V., & Verburg, P. H. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007 · Cited by 624
Self-citation
Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data
Zanten, B. T. V., Berkel, D. V., Meentemeyer, R. K., Smith, J. W., Tieskens, K. F., & Verburg, P. H. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614158113 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Aesthetic appreciation of the cultural landscape through social media: An analysis of revealed preference in the Dutch river landscape
Tieskens, K. F., Zanten, B. T. V., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.002 · Cited by 230
Self-citation
Characterizing European cultural landscapes: Accounting for structure, management intensity and value of agricultural and forest landscapes
Tieskens, K. F., Schulp, C. J. E., Levers, C., Lieskovský, J., Kuemmerle, T., Plieninger, T., & Verburg, P. H. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.001 · Cited by 204
Self-citation
He is a Stud, She is a Slut! A Meta-Analysis on the Continued Existence of Sexual Double Standards
Endendijk, J. J., van Baar, A. L., & Deković, M. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868319891310 · Cited by 200
A Synthesis of Land Use/Land Cover Studies: Definitions, Classification Systems, Meta-Studies, Challenges and Knowledge Gaps on a Global Landscape
Nedd, R., Light, K., Owens, M. A., James, N., Johnson, E., & Anandhi, A. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10090994 · Cited by 227
Beautiful agricultural landscapes promote cultural ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation
Assandri, G., Bogliani, G., Pedrini, P., & Brambilla, M. (2018) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.012 · Cited by 169
A comparative approach to assess the contribution of landscape features to aesthetic and recreational values in agricultural landscapes
Zanten, B. T. V., Zasada, I., Koetse, M. J., Ungaro, F., Häfner, K., & Verburg, P. H. (2015) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.011 · Cited by 164
Self-citation
Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany
Hermes, J., Albert, C., & von Haaren, C. (2018) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015 · Cited by 157
Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes
Fagerholm, N., Torralba, M., Moreno, G., Girardello, M., Herzog, F., Aviron, S., Burgess, P. J., Crous-Durán, J., Ferreiro‐Domínguez, N., Graves, A. R., et al. (2019) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002 · Cited by 136
Crowdsourcing geo-information on landscape perceptions and preferences: A review
Bubalo, M., Zanten, B. T. V., & Verburg, P. H. (2019) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.01.001 · Cited by 137
Self-citation
Effects of landscape configuration on mapping ecosystem service capacity: a review of evidence and a case study in Scotland
Verhagen, W., Teeffelen, A. V. V., Compagnucci, A. B., Poggio, L., Gimona, A., & Verburg, P. (2016) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-016-0345-2 · Cited by 102
Self-citation
Governance of ecosystem services trade-offs in peri-urban landscapes
Spyra, M., Rosa, D. L., Zasada, I., Sylla, M., & Shkaruba, A. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104617 · Cited by 105
Comparing text-only and virtual reality discrete choice experiments of neighbourhood choice
Patterson, Z., Darbani, J. M., Rezaei, A., Zacharias, J., & Yazdizadeh, A. (2016) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.024 · Cited by 108
Assessing landscape preferences: a visual choice experiment in the agricultural region of Märkische Schweiz, Germany
Häfner, K., Zasada, I., Zanten, B. T. V., Ungaro, F., Koetse, M. J., & Piorr, A. (2017) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1386289 · Cited by 103
Self-citation
Representing composition, spatial structure and management intensity of European agricultural landscapes: A new typology
van der Zanden, E. H., Levers, C., Verburg, P. H., & Kuemmerle, T. (2016) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.005 · Cited by 101
Self-citation
Awareness and perceptions of ecosystem services in relation to land use types: Evidence from rural communities in Nigeria
Zhang, W., Kato, E., Bhandary, P., Nkonya, E. M., Ibrahim, H. I., Agbonlahor, M., Ibrahim, H. Y., & Cox, C. M. (2016) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.011 · Cited by 98
More than wine: Cultural ecosystem services in vineyard landscapes in England and California
Winkler, K. J., & Nicholas, K. A. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.013 · Cited by 85
Spatial modelling of landscape aesthetic potential in urban-rural fringes
Sahraoui, Y., Clauzel, C., & Foltête, J. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.031 · Cited by 85
A conceptual model to integrate the regional context in landscape policy, management and contribution to rural development: Literature review and European case study evidence
Zasada, I., Häfner, K., Schaller, L. L., Zanten, B. T. V., Lefebvre, M., Malak-Rawlikowska, A., Nikolov, D., Rodríguez‐Entrena, M., Manrique, R., Ungaro, F., et al. (2017) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.03.012 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Mapping landscape potential for outdoor recreation using different archetypical recreation user groups in the European Union
Komossa, F., van der Zanden, E. H., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2017) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.015 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
Abandoning or Reimagining a Cultural Heartland? Understanding and Responding to Rewilding Conflicts in Wales – the Case of the Cambrian Wildwood
Wynne‐Jones, S., Strouts, G., & Holmes, G. (2018) · Environmental Values · doi:10.3197/096327118x15251686827723 · Cited by 73
Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania
Kalinauskas, M., Mikša, K., Inácio, M., Gomes, E., & Pereira, P. A. D. S. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112239 · Cited by 69
Local Perceptions of Ecosystem Services Across Multiple Ecosystem Types in Spain
García‐Llorente, M., Castro, A. A., Quintas‐Soriano, C., Oteros‐Rozas, E., Iniesta-Arandia, I., González, J. A., García‐del‐Amo, D., Hernández-Arroyo, M., Casado‐Arzuaga, I., Palomo, I., et al. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9090330 · Cited by 63
Non-native Species and the Aesthetics of Nature
Kueffer, C., & Kull, C. A. (2017) · Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3_20 · Cited by 63
Landscape aesthetic modelling using Bayesian networks: Conceptual framework and participatory indicator weighting
Kerebel, A., Gélinas, N., Déry, S., Voigt, B., & Munson, A. D. (2019) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.001 · Cited by 63
From preference to landscape sustainability: a bibliometric review of landscape preference research from 1968 to 2019
Yang, G., Yu, Z., Zhang, J., & Kristensen, L. S. (2021) · Ecosystem Health and Sustainability · doi:10.1080/20964129.2021.1948355 · Cited by 52
Using choice modeling to map aesthetic values at a landscape scale: Lessons from a Dutch case study
Zanten, B. T. V., Verburg, P. H., Scholte, S. S. K., & Tieskens, K. F. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.008 · Cited by 49
Self-citation
Understanding different cultural ecosystem services: An exploration of rural landscape preferences based on geographic and social media data
Li, Y., Xie, L., Zhang, L., Huang, L., Lin, Y., Su, Y., Shahtahmassebi, A., He, S., Zhu, C., Li, S., et al. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115487 · Cited by 48
Socio-cultural valuation of Polish agricultural landscape components by farmers and its consequences
Włodarczyk‐Marciniak, R., Frankiewicz, P., & Krauze, K. (2020) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.017 · Cited by 48
Public preferences for pasture landscapes in Germany—A latent class analysis of a nationwide discrete choice experiment
Schaak, H., & Mußhoff, O. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104371 · Cited by 45
From meta-studies to modeling: Using synthesis knowledge to build broadly applicable process-based land change models
Magliocca, N. R., van Vliet, J., Brown, C., Evans, T. P., Houet, T., Messerli, P., Messina, J. P., Nicholas, K. A., Ornetsmüller, C., Sagebiel, J., et al. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.06.009 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Spatially explicit demand for afforestation
Sagebiel, J., Glenk, K., & Meyerhoff, J. (2017) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.021 · Cited by 45
Landscape characterization using photographs from crowdsourced platforms: content analysis of social media photographs
Callau, A. À., Albert, Y. P., Rota, J. J., & Giné, D. S. (2019) · Open Geosciences · doi:10.1515/geo-2019-0046 · Cited by 45
Geographical heterogeneity in mountain grasslands dynamics in the Austrian-Italian Tyrol region
Hinojosa, L., Tasser, E., Rüdisser, J., Leitinger, G., Schermer, M., Lambin, É. F., & Tappeiner, U. (2019) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.03.006 · Cited by 43
A Meta‐analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Cultural Services from Grasslands in Europe
Huber, R., & Finger, R. (2019) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12361 · Cited by 46
Characterizing outdoor recreation user groups: A typology of peri-urban recreationists in the Kromme Rijn area, the Netherlands
Komossa, F., van der Zanden, E. H., & Verburg, P. H. (2018) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.017 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Rewilding and the risk of creating new, unwanted ecological interactions
Delibez-Mateos, M., Barrio, I. C., Barbosa, A. M., Martínez Solano, I., Fa, J. E., & Ferreira, C. C. (2019) · e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) · Cited by 41
The Importance of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity for Landscape Visitors in the Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb (Germany)
Müller, S. M., Peisker, J., Bieling, C., Linnemann, K., Reidl, K., & Schmieder, K. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11092650 · Cited by 44
Vernacular or modern: Transitional preferences of residents living in varied stages of urbanisation regarding rural landscape features
Zhang, X., Li, H., Jian, Y., Fu, H., Wang, Z., & Xu, M. (2022) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.07.011 · Cited by 38
Urban Sprawl Assessment in Eight Mid-sized Indian Cities Using RS and GIS
Chettry, V., & Surawar, M. (2021) · Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1007/s12524-021-01420-8 · Cited by 36
Evaluation for landscape aesthetic value of the Natural World Heritage Site
Ha, S., & Yang, Z. (2019) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-019-7607-9 · Cited by 35
Expanding the toolbox: Assessing methods for local outdoor recreation planning
Komossa, F., Wartmann, F. M., & Verburg, P. H. (2021) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104105 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
What does the UK public want farmland to look like?
Rust, N. A., Rehackova, L., Naab, F. Z., Abrams, A. L., Hughes, C., Merkle, B. G., Clark, B., & Tindale, S. J. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105445 · Cited by 34
Beyond blue-sky thinking: Diurnal patterns and ephemeral meteorological phenomena impact appraisals of beauty, awe, and value in urban and natural landscapes
Smalley, A. J., & White, M. P. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101955 · Cited by 37
Seeing through their eyes: Revealing recreationists’ landscape preferences through viewshed analysis and machine learning
Lehto, C., Hedblom, M., Filyushkina, A., & Ranius, T. (2024) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105097 · Cited by 35
Resident and stakeholder perceptions of ecosystem services associated with agricultural landscapes in New Hampshire
Wilhelm, J. A., Smith, R. G., Jolejole-Foreman, M. C., & Hurley, S. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101153 · Cited by 33
Challenges for a shared European countryside of uncertain future. Towards a modern community-based landscape perspective
Pedroli, B., Pinto‐Correia, T., & Primdahl, J. (2016) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2016.1156072 · Cited by 33
The role of emotions on tourists’ willingness to pay for the Alpine landscape: a latent class approach
Notaro, S., Grilli, G., & Paletto, A. (2018) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2018.1513129 · Cited by 38
Whole system valuation of arable, agroforestry and tree-only systems at three case study sites in Europe
Giannitsopoulos, M. L., Graves, A. R., Burgess, P. J., Crous-Durán, J., Moreno, G., Herzog, F., Palma, J. H. N., Kay, S., & de Jalón, S. G. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122283 · Cited by 31
Determining and quantifying the historical traces of spatial land arrangements in rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe
Prus, B., Dudzińska, M., & Bacior, S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-02892-x · Cited by 28
Agricultural landscapes between intensification and abandonment: the expectations of the public in a Central-Alpine cross-border region
Pecher, C., Bacher, M., Tasser, E., & Tappeiner, U. (2017) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1315062 · Cited by 28
The adaptation of urban farms to cities: The case of the Alella wine region within the Barcelona Metropolitan Region
Recasens, X., Alfranca, Ó., & Maldonado, L. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.023 · Cited by 27
Effect of four rearing substrates on the yield and the chemical composition of housefly larvae, Musca domestica L. 1758 (Diptera: Muscidae)
Ganda, H., Zannou, E. T., Kenis, M., Abihona, H. A., Houndonougbo, F. M., Chrysostome, C. A. A. M., Chougourou, D. C., & Mensah, G. A. (2021) · International Journal of Tropical Insect Science · doi:10.1007/s42690-021-00651-z · Cited by 27
Landscape usage by recreationists is shaped by availability: Insights from a national PPGIS survey in Sweden
Lehto, C., Hedblom, M., Öckinger, E., & Ranius, T. (2022) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104519 · Cited by 26
Assessment of landscape resource using the scenic beauty estimation method at compound ecological system
Mo, L., Chen, J., & Xie, Y. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10978-8 · Cited by 26
Back to the Village: Assessing the Effects of Naturalness, Landscape Types, and Landscape Elements on the Restorative Potential of Rural Landscapes
Shen, H., He, X., He, J., Li, D., Liang, M., & Xie, X. (2024) · Land · doi:10.3390/land13070910 · Cited by 25
Social media for landscape planning and design: a review and discussion
Li, S.-J., & Yang, B. (2022) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2022.2060953 · Cited by 21
Rewilding a country: Britain as a study case
Sandom, C. J., & Wynne‐Jones, S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108560962.012 · Cited by 25
Assessing the ability of rural agrarian areas to provide cultural ecosystem services (CES): A multi scale social indicator framework (MSIF)
Ribeiro, S. M. C., Pinto‐Correia, T., Paracchini, M. L., Schüpbach, B., Sang, Å. O., Vanderheyden, V., Southern, A., Jones, P., Contreras, B., & O’Riordan, T. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.024 · Cited by 25
A landscape menu to please them all: Relating users’ preferences to land cover classes in the Mediterranean region of Alentejo, Southern Portugal
Surová, D., & Pinto‐Correia, T. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.026 · Cited by 23
Mapping Landscape Perception: An Assessment with Public Participation Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Analysis Techniques
Buendía, A. V. P., Albert, Y. P., & Giné, D. S. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10060632 · Cited by 23
Quantifying and mapping landscape value using online texts: A deep learning approach
Liao, J., Liao, Q., Wang, W., Shen, S., Sun, Y., Xiao, P., Cao, Y., & Chen, J. (2023) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102950 · Cited by 23
Economic valuation at all cost? The role of the price attribute in a landscape preference study
Zanten, B. T. V., Koetse, M. J., & Verburg, P. H. (2016) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.03.003 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Public participation in defining landscape planning scenarios and landscape quality objectives (LQO): Landscape Guidelines for Galicia (NW Spain) case study
Santé, I., Tubio, J. M., & Miranda, D. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104559 · Cited by 24
Ecological compensation of grain trade within urban, rural areas and provinces in China: a prospect of a carbon transfer mechanism
Deng, Y., Sarkar, A., Cui, Y. S., Lu, Q., Minjuan, Z., & Das, J. C. (2021) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01376-2 · Cited by 22
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Zhang, W., Dulloo, E., Kennedy, G., Bailey, A., Sandhu, H., & Nkonya, E. M. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812134-4.00008-x · Cited by 24
Perspectives of farmers and tourists on agricultural abandonment in east Lesvos, Greece
Zagaria, C., Schulp, C. J. E., Kizos, T., & Verburg, P. H. (2018) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-017-1276-4 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Visitors’ preferences for landscape conservation in Alpine environments:Differences across regions, conservation programmes, and socio-economic groups
Getzner, M. (2019) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2019.1677881 · Cited by 20
A multitiered approach for grassland ecosystem services mapping and assessment: The Viva Grass tool
Villoslada, M., Vinogradovs, I., Ruskule, A., Veidemane, K., Nikodemus, O., Kasparinskis, R., Sepp, K., & Gulbinas, J. (2018) · One Ecosystem · doi:10.3897/oneeco.3.e25380 · Cited by 19
Understanding Landscape Aesthetics Using a Novel Viewshed Assessment of Social Media Locations Within the Troodos UNESCO Global Geopark, Cyprus
Fox, N., Chamberlain, B. C., Lindquist, M., & Berkel, D. V. (2022) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.884115 · Cited by 18
What determines preferences for semi-natural habitats in agrarian landscapes? A choice-modelling approach across two countries using attributes characterising vegetation
Schüpbach, B., Weiß, S. B., Jeanneret, P., Zalai, M., Szalai, M., & Frör, O. (2020) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103954 · Cited by 18
Mapping Chinese land system types from the perspectives of land use and management, biodiversity conservation and cultural landscape
Jin, X., Jiang, P., Li, M., Gao, Y., & Yang, L. (2022) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108981 · Cited by 19
Landscape complexity perception and representation in a wine-growing region with the designation of origin in the Loire Valley (France): a cultural ecosystem service?
Hervé, M. E. T., Boudes, P., Cieslik, C., Montembault, D., Jung, V., Burel, F., Cluzeau, D., Winter, S., & Nicolaï, A. (2018) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170518000273 · Cited by 16
Preferences of motorcyclists to views of managed, rural southern United States landscapes
Merry, K. L., Bettinger, P., Siry, J. P., & Bowker, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism · doi:10.1016/j.jort.2019.100259 · Cited by 16
Heterogeneous Preferences for Public Goods Provided by Agriculture in a Region of Intensive Agricultural Production: The Case of the Marchfeld
Niedermayr, A., Schaller, L. L., Mariel, P., Kieninger, P., & Kantelhardt, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10062061 · Cited by 22
The social valuation of agro-ecosystem services at different scales: A case study from Kyrenia (Girne) Region of Northern Cyprus
Ciftcioglu, G. C. (2021) · Environmental Development · doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100645 · Cited by 15
Does the CAP reflect the population's concerns about agricultural landscapes? A qualitative study in Lower Saxony, Germany
Schüler, S., & Noack, E. M. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.041 · Cited by 14
Landscape Aesthetics Capacity as a Cultural Ecosystem Service
Ribeiro, S. M. C., Schroth, O., Gyuró, É. K., Hermes, J., Boll, T., & von Haaren, C. (2019) · Landscape series · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1681-7_15 · Cited by 14
Validation of a visual landscape quality indicator for agrarian landscapes using public participatory GIS data
Schüpbach, B., & Kay, S. (2023) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104906 · Cited by 13
Landscape experiences as a cultural ecosystem service in a Nordic context
Lindhjem, H., Reinvang, R., & Zandersen, M. (2015) · Nordic Council of Ministers eBooks · doi:10.6027/tn2015-549 · Cited by 13
Landscapes as represented in textbooks and in students’ imagination: stability, generational gap, image retention and recognisability
Urbanc, M., Fridl, J., & Planinc, T. R. (2020) · Children s Geographies · doi:10.1080/14733285.2020.1817333 · Cited by 13
Ecosystem Services Research in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis
Ge, B., Wang, C., & Song, Y. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15065082 · Cited by 12
Towards an understanding of quality and inclusivity in human‐environment experiences
Palmer, A. K., Riley, M., Brockett, B., Evans, K. L., Jones, L., & Clément, S. (2023) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12723 · Cited by 12
Perception of Urban Green Areas Associated with Sociodemographic Affiliation, Structural Elements, and Acceptance Stripes
Zobec, M., Betz, O., & Unterweger, P. (2020) · Urban Science · doi:10.3390/urbansci4010009 · Cited by 15
A generic marginal value function for natural areas
Koetse, M. J., Verhoef, E. T., & Brander, L. (2016) · The Annals of Regional Science · doi:10.1007/s00168-016-0795-0 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Do people prefer natural landscapes? An empirical study in Chile
Laura Nahuelhual, M., Laterra, P., Jiménez, D., Báez, A., Echeverría, C., & Fuentes, R. (2018) · Bosque (Valdivia) · doi:10.4067/s0717-92002018000200205 · Cited by 12
The look of agricultural landscapes – How do non-crop landscape elements contribute to visual preferences in a large-scale agricultural landscape?
Stokstad, G., Krøgli, S. O., & Dramstad, W. (2020) · Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography · doi:10.1080/00291951.2020.1754284 · Cited by 12
How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study
Boeraeve, F., Dufrêne, M., Dendoncker, N., Dupire, A., & Mahy, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12062480 · Cited by 11
“Local-based approaches are relevant when addressing landscape perceptions, since preferences for landscape attributes are highly context-specific [17,18,55].”
Background
Assessing the influence of individual factors on visual and auditory preference for rural landscape: the case of Chengdu, China
Luo, H., Deng, L., Jiang, S., Song, C., Fu, E., Ma, J., Sun, L., Huang, Z., Jiang, M., Zhu, C., et al. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2021.1903403 · Cited by 11
Exploring agricultural landscape change from the second half of the twentieth century onwards: combining aerial imagery with farmer perspectives
Mohr, F., Pazúr, R., Debonne, N., Dossche, R., Helfenstein, J., Hepner, S., Levers, C., Verburg, P. H., & Bürgi, M. (2024) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-024-01914-z · Cited by 11
Self-citation
The influence of satellite imagery on landscape perception
Saldias, D. S. M., Reinke, K. J., McLennan, B. J., & Wallace, L. O. (2021) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2021.1886264 · Cited by 11
Integrating Agricultural and Ecotourism Development: A Crop Cultivation Suitability Framework Considering Tourists’ Landscape Preferences in Qinghai Province, China
Wang, H., Zhan, J., Wang, C., Blinov, O. A., Kumi, M. A., Liu, W., Chu, X., Teng, Y., Liu, H., Zheng, Y., et al. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15194685 · Cited by 11
Land Tenure as a Factor Underlying Agricultural Landscape Changes in Europe: A Review
Krčílková, Š., & Janovska, V. (2016) · Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica · doi:10.1515/sab-2016-0011 · Cited by 11
Perceived benefits from reclaimed rural landscapes: Evidence from the lowlands of the Po River Delta, Italy
Targetti, S., Raggi, M., Zavalloni, M., & Viaggi, D. (2021) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101288 · Cited by 11
Research progress of ecosystem services based on stakeholder's perception
Zhang, Y., Liu, B., Xu, B. I., Bin, W. A. N. G., & Sui, R. (2023) · 自然资源学报 · doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20230512 · Cited by 10
Correlations among AHP-based scenic beauty estimation and water quality indicators of typical urban constructed WQT wetland park landscaping
Huang, Y., Li, T., Jin, Y. F., & Wu, W. (2023) · AQUA - Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society · doi:10.2166/aqua.2023.071 · Cited by 14
A Bayesian network highlighting the linkages between landscape structure and the local economy: the case of agritourism in lowland areas of Northern Italy
Manrique, R., Viaggi, D., & Raggi, M. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2015.1059738 · Cited by 10
Assessing Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Landscape Attributes in Lithuania
Rocchi, L., Novikova, A., & Vaznonis, B. (2022) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11101620 · Cited by 9

Authors: van Zanten, B. T., Verburg, P. H., Koetse, M. J., & van Beukering, P. J. H.
Affiliations: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
ORCID: Verburg, Peter H.
Koetse, Mark J.
Venue: Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2014-12
Volume: 132
Pages: 89-101
ISSN: 0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012
OpenAlex: W2072064163
Cited by: 150
References: 62
Citations by year: 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI: 3.33
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders: European Commission
Topics: Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
Keywords: agricultural landscapes, landscape preference, stated preference, landscape attributes, historic buildings, livestock, socioeconomic context, population density, GDP per capita, upscaling, landscape policy, European landscapes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks