The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Local-based approaches are relevant when addressing landscape perceptions, since preferences for landscape attributes are highly context-specific [17,18,55].”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cites
Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
Wooldridge, J. M. (1999) · Cited by 14,354
Case study research: principles and practices
Gerring, J. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1530 · Cited by 4,146
Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation
GEIST, H. J., & LAMBIN, E. F. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:pcaudf]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,123
Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda
Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C. G., Gobster, P. H., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1114773109 · Cited by 1,645
Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
Chan, K. M. A., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S. C., Satterfield, T. A., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R. K., Halpern, B. S., et al. (2012) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7 · Cited by 1,123
The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?
Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. L. A. (2007) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x · Cited by 994
Zasada, I. (2011) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008 · Cited by 798
Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character
Tveit, M. S., Sang, Å. O., & Fry, G. L. A. (2006) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426390600783269 · Cited by 721
The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature
Brander, L., Florax, R. J. G. M., & Vermaat, J. E. (2006) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4 · Cited by 645
The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: An Assessment
Nelson, J. P., & Kennedy, P. (2008) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-008-9253-5 · Cited by 549
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Van der Zanden, E. H., Levers, C., Verburg, P. H., & Kuemmerle, T. (in review). A European typology of agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – Five hypotheses
Tscharntke, T., Karp, D. S., Chaplin‐Kramer, R., Batáry, P., DeClerck, F., Gratton, C., Hunt, L. G., Ives, A. R., Jonsson, M., Larsen, A., et al. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.001 · Cited by 661
Scholte, S. S. K., Teeffelen, A. J. A. V., & Verburg, P. H. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007 · Cited by 624
Self-citationContinental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data
Zanten, B. T. V., Berkel, D. V., Meentemeyer, R. K., Smith, J. W., Tieskens, K. F., & Verburg, P. H. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614158113 · Cited by 306
Self-citationTieskens, K. F., Zanten, B. T. V., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.002 · Cited by 230
Self-citationTieskens, K. F., Schulp, C. J. E., Levers, C., Lieskovský, J., Kuemmerle, T., Plieninger, T., & Verburg, P. H. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.001 · Cited by 204
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van Zanten, B. T., Verburg, P. H., Koetse, M. J., & van Beukering, P. J. H.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Landscape and Urban Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 89-101
- ISSN
- 0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072064163
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
- Keywords
- agricultural landscapes, landscape preference, stated preference, landscape attributes, historic buildings, livestock, socioeconomic context, population density, GDP per capita, upscaling, landscape policy, European landscapes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review