Cited by 150Economic and Environmental ValuationLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban and spatial planning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies

van Zanten, Boris T., Verburg, Peter H., Koetse, Mark J., van Beukering, Pieter J.H.·2014·Landscape and Urban Planning

DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach
Wooldridge, J. M. (1999) · Cited by 14,354
Case study research: principles and practices
Gerring, J. (2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1530 · Cited by 4,146
Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation
GEIST, H. J., & LAMBIN, E. F. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:pcaudf]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,123
Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda
Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C. G., Gobster, P. H., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1114773109 · Cited by 1,645
Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
Chan, K. M. A., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S. C., Satterfield, T. A., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R. K., Halpern, B. S., et al. (2012) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7 · Cited by 1,123
The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?
Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. L. A. (2007) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x · Cited by 994
Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming
Zasada, I. (2011) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.01.008 · Cited by 798
Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character
Tveit, M. S., Sang, Å. O., & Fry, G. L. A. (2006) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426390600783269 · Cited by 721
The Empirics of Wetland Valuation: A Comprehensive Summary and a Meta-Analysis of the Literature
Brander, L., Florax, R. J. G. M., & Vermaat, J. E. (2006) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4 · Cited by 645
The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: An Assessment
Nelson, J. P., & Kennedy, P. (2008) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-008-9253-5 · Cited by 549
Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder?
Lothian, A. (1999) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(99)00019-5 · Cited by 544
The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP
Bateman, I. J., Day, B., Stavros Georgiou, A., & LAKE, I. R. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003 · Cited by 474
Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape
Berkel, D. V., & Verburg, P. H. (2012) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025 · Cited by 410
Self-citation
European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review
Zanten, B. T. V., Verburg, P. H., Espinosa, M., Gomez‐y‐Paloma, S., Galimberti, G., Kantelhardt, J., Kapfer, M., Lefebvre, M., Manrique, R., Piorr, A., et al. (2013) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4 · Cited by 409
Self-citation
Capturing Landscape Visual Character Using Indicators: Touching Base with Landscape Aesthetic Theory
Sang, Å. O., Tveit, M. S., & Fry, G. L. A. (2008) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426390701773854 · Cited by 407
The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results
Brander, L., & Koetse, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019 · Cited by 406
Self-citation
Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference
Sang, Å. O., Fry, G. L. A., Tveit, M. S., Messager, P., & Miller, D. G. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.013 · Cited by 403
Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences
Kaltenborn, B. P., & Bjerke, T. (2002) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00243-2 · Cited by 384
The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation
Lindemann-Matthies, P., Junge, X., & Matthies, D. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.003 · Cited by 361
Drivers of Wetland Conversion: a Global Meta-Analysis
van Asselen, S., Verburg, P. H., Vermaat, J. E., & Janse, J. H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081292 · Cited by 352
Self-citation
New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes
den Berg, A. E. V., & Koole, S. L. (2006) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.11.006 · Cited by 305
A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): A transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes
Mücher, C. A., Klijn, J. A., Wascher, D. M., & Schaminée, J. H. J. (2009) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.018 · Cited by 300
Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders: Looking beyond aesthetics
Rogge, E., Nevens, F., & Gulinck, H. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.006 · Cited by 273
Mapping ecosystem services: The supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe
Stürck, J., Poortinga, A., & Verburg, P. H. (2013) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010 · Cited by 264
Self-citation
Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups
Tveit, M. S. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021 · Cited by 261
Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics' preferences towards rural landscapes
Howley, P. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.026 · Cited by 252
Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface
Soini, K., Vaarala, H., & Pouta, E. (2011) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.002 · Cited by 232
The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach
García‐Llorente, M., Martín‐López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., López, C. A., Aguilera, P. A., & Montes, C. (2012) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006 · Cited by 224
Public preferences for landscape features: The case of agricultural landscape in mountainous Mediterranean areas
Sayadi, S., González-Roa, M. C., & Calatrava-Requena, J. (2008) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.003 · Cited by 224
Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements: Combining Mixed Logit and Random‐Effects Models
Campbell, D. (2007) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00117.x · Cited by 207
From Hiking Through Farmland to Farming in a Leisure Landscape: Changing Social Perceptions of the European Landscape
Buijs, A. E., Pedroli, B., & Luginbühl, Y. (2006) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-005-5223-2 · Cited by 206
A Portfolio Approach to Analyzing Complex Human-Environment Interactions: Institutions and Land Change
Young, O. R., Lambin, É. F., Alcock, F., Haberl, H., Karlsson‐Vinkhuyzen, S., McConnell, W. J., Myint, T., Pahl‐Wostl, C., Polsky, C., Ramakrishnan, P. S., et al. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01799-110231 · Cited by 178
Self-citation
Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes
Sevenant, M., & Antrop, M. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.016 · Cited by 176
Meta-analyses of case studies: A method for studying regional and global environmental change
Rudel, T. K. (2007) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.001 · Cited by 174
Landscape Evaluation: The Theoretical Vacuum
Appleton, J. (1975) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.2307/621625 · Cited by 174
Evaluation of Landscape Change by Different Social Groups
Hunziker, M., Felber, P., Gehring, K., Buchecker, M., Bauer, N., & Kienast, F. (2008) · Mountain Research and Development · doi:10.1659/mrd.0952 · Cited by 171
Potential impacts of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty - a prototypical technique for automated rapid assessment
Hunziker, M., & Kienast, F. (1999) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1008079715913 · Cited by 163
Valuing Landscape: a Contingent Valuation Approach
Willis, K. G., & Garrod, G. D. (1993) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1006/jema.1993.1001 · Cited by 150
Using Meta-Analysis and GIS for Value Transfer and Scaling Up: Valuing Climate Change Induced Losses of European Wetlands
Brander, L., Bräuer, I., Gerdes, H., Ghermandi, A., Kuik, O. J., Markandya, A., Ståle Navrud, A., Nunes, P. A. L. D., Schaafsma, M., de Vos, H., et al. (2011) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-011-9535-1 · Cited by 147
The use of latent classes to identify individual differences in the importance of landscape dimensions for aesthetic preference
Sevenant, M., & Antrop, M. (2009) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.11.002 · Cited by 144
Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment method?
Rambonilaza, M., & Dachary-Bernard, J. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.013 · Cited by 137
Mapping and modelling of changes in agricultural intensity in Europe
Temme, A. J. A. M., & Verburg, P. H. (2010) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.010 · Cited by 134
Self-citation
Dealing with landscape fuzziness in user preference studies: Photo-based questionnaires in the Mediterranean context
Barroso, F., Pinto‐Correia, T., Ramos, I. L., Surová, D., & Menezes, H. (2011) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.005 · Cited by 113
Changes in use and landscape preferences on the agricultural-livestock landscapes of the central Iberian Peninsula (Madrid, Spain)
Gómez-Limón, J., & Fernández, J. V. D. L. (1999) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(99)00020-1 · Cited by 112
Aesthetic preferences of non-farmers and farmers for different land-use types and proportions of ecological compensation areas in the Swiss lowlands
Junge, X., Lindemann‐Matthies, P., Hunziker, M., & Schüpbach, B. (2011) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.012 · Cited by 98
Exploring the Heterogeneity of Rural Landscape Preferences: An Image-Based Latent Class Approach
Arnberger, A., & Eder, R. (2011) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2010.536204 · Cited by 91
Modelling the spatial distribution of linear landscape elements in Europe
van der Zanden, E. H., Verburg, P. H., & Mücher, C. A. (2012) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.002 · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Are citizens willing to pay for agricultural multifunctionality?
Kallas, Z., Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Arriaza, M. (2007) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00216.x · Cited by 86
Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium
Liekens, I., Schaafsma, M., Nocker, L. D., Broekx, S., Staes, J., Aertsens, J., & Brouwer, R. (2012) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.008 · Cited by 77
Choice experiment, multiple programmes contingent valuation and landscape preferences: How can we support the land use decision making process?
Dachary-Bernard, J., & Rambonilaza, T. (2012) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.002 · Cited by 75
Quantifying public preferences for agri-environmental policy in Scotland: A comparison of methods
Moran, D., McVittie, A., Allcroft, D. J., & Elston, D. A. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.018 · Cited by 74
To restore or not? A valuation of social and ecological functions of the Marais des Baux wetland in Southern France
Westerberg, V., Lifran, R., & Olsen, S. B. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.005 · Cited by 69
Valuing public goods of the agricultural landscape: a choice experiment using reference points to capture observable heterogeneity
Hasund, K. P., Kataria, M., & Lagerkvist, C. J. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.502753 · Cited by 63
Driving forces behind landscape transformation in Europe, from a conceptual approach to policy options
Klijn, J. A. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-2911-0_14 · Cited by 61
Valuing the benefits of an afforestation project in a peri-urban area with choice experiments
Vecchiato, D., & Tempesta, T. (2012) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.001 · Cited by 61
Application of the analytic hierarchy process to a sustainability assessment of coastal beach exploitation: A case study of the wind power projects on the coastal beaches of Yancheng, China
Tian, W., Bai, J., Sun, H., & Zhao, Y. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.015 · Cited by 59
Differences in Preferences towards Potential Future Landscapes in the Swiss Alps
Soliva, R., Bolliger, J., & Hunziker, M. (2010) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2010.519436 · Cited by 56
Implementation of a EU wide indicator for the rural-agrarian landscapeIn support of COM(2006)508 “Development of agri-environmental indicators for monitoring the integration of environmental concerns into the Common Agricultural Policy”
Maria-Luisa, P., & Capitani, C. (2011) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/25137 · Cited by 34
Countryside Preferences: Exploring Individuals' Willingness to Pay for the Conservation of the Traditional Farm Landscape
Howley, P., Hynes, S., & O’Donoghue, C. (2012) · Landscape Research · doi:10.1080/01426397.2011.637619 · Cited by 31
SCOPING STUDY ON AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE VALUATION
Swanwick, C., Hanley, N. D., & Termansen, M. (2007) · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 1

Van der Zanden, E. H., Levers, C., Verburg, P. H., & Kuemmerle, T. (in review). A European typology of agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning.

Sorted by citations

When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – Five hypotheses
Tscharntke, T., Karp, D. S., Chaplin‐Kramer, R., Batáry, P., DeClerck, F., Gratton, C., Hunt, L. G., Ives, A. R., Jonsson, M., Larsen, A., et al. (2016) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.001 · Cited by 661
Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: A review of concepts and methods
Scholte, S. S. K., Teeffelen, A. J. A. V., & Verburg, P. H. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007 · Cited by 624
Self-citation
Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data
Zanten, B. T. V., Berkel, D. V., Meentemeyer, R. K., Smith, J. W., Tieskens, K. F., & Verburg, P. H. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614158113 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Aesthetic appreciation of the cultural landscape through social media: An analysis of revealed preference in the Dutch river landscape
Tieskens, K. F., Zanten, B. T. V., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.002 · Cited by 230
Self-citation
Characterizing European cultural landscapes: Accounting for structure, management intensity and value of agricultural and forest landscapes
Tieskens, K. F., Schulp, C. J. E., Levers, C., Lieskovský, J., Kuemmerle, T., Plieninger, T., & Verburg, P. H. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.001 · Cited by 204
Self-citation

See all 150

Authors: van Zanten, B. T., Verburg, P. H., Koetse, M. J., & van Beukering, P. J. H.
Affiliations: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
ORCID: Verburg, Peter H.
Koetse, Mark J.
Venue: Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2014-12
Volume: 132
Pages: 89-101
ISSN: 0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012
OpenAlex: W2072064163
Cited by: 150
References: 62
Citations by year: 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI: 3.33
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders: European Commission
Topics: Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
Keywords: agricultural landscapes, landscape preference, stated preference, landscape attributes, historic buildings, livestock, socioeconomic context, population density, GDP per capita, upscaling, landscape policy, European landscapes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks