Cited by 189Urban and spatial planningLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesAgricultural Economics and Policy

Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: The impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity

Lindemann-Matthies, Petra, Briegel, Reinhold, Schüpbach, Beatrice, Junge, Xenia·2010·Landscape and Urban Planning

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.015

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindemann-Matthies, P., Briegel, R., Schüpbach, B., & Junge, X.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
99-109
ISSN
0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013385769
Cited by
189
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
Keywords
scenic beauty, aesthetic preference, alpine landscape, agricultural land use, agrobiodiversity, ecological compensation areas, agri-environmental schemes, grassland management intensity, arable land, hedges, landscape attractiveness, tourism, recreation, Swiss Alps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review