Cited by 34Urban Design and Spatial AnalysisRegional Economics and Spatial AnalysisGlobal Urban Networks and Dynamics

Administrative boundaries and urban areas in Italy: A perspective from scaling laws

Open access
Alvioli, Massimiliano·2020·Landscape and Urban Planning

Abstract

Delineating boundaries of urban areas is no easy task, due to the inherent complexity of the problem, heterogeneity of relevant data and little consensus on how to properly measure the results. Any such delineation must eventually be cast onto administrative boundaries, an essential requirement for real-world applications. In the effort of relating administrative and alternative boundaries, we investigated in Italy the validity of general scaling laws, such as the area-population relation, and proposed a practical application. Relying on open data for population, settlements and road networks, we showed the extent to which scaling relations hold for different boundaries for urban areas, and how they compare to each other. We considered, beside Italian municipalities, urban areas based on the idea of "natural cities", obtained using head/tail breaks of areas related to human mobility as an explicit indicator of existence of a city. Area-population data for administrative boundaries can be reconciled with scaling relations valid for both the world's cities data and with those obtained from natural cities, provided an effective area is adopted in place of polygon planimetric area of municipalities. We eventually proposed an aggregation of administrative units using the empirical scaling relation as an objective function for accepting or rejecting pairwise fusion of boundaries. We suggest considering such a method, along with expert considerations, as an additional tool for real-world urban planning as seen from the very general perspective of seemingly abstract scaling laws.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103906

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present analysis at the municipality level is not directly comparable with past works in urban scaling laws literature.

    “It should be noted that the present analysis at the municipality level is not directly comparable with past works in urban scaling laws literature”

    From Scaling Behavior of Public Procurement Activity (2021) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Results section says the municipality-level effective-area–population relation “compares well with European cities data,” and the Discussion places its exponent within the range reported in earlier literature. The paper distinguishes raw municipal area from effective built-up area, but it does not characterize its municipality-level analysis as not directly comparable with past urban-scaling work. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Alvioli M. Comparative study of delineation of urban areas using imperviousness products and open data Alvioli M. Marchesini I. Melelli L. Guth P. Proceedings of the Geomorphometry 2020 Conference 2020 CNR Edizioni Perugia, Italy 266 10.30437/GEOMORPHOMETRY2020_1 · DOI
  2. van Raan A.F.J. Urban scaling in Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands Relation with Governance Structures 2019 arXiv e-prints arXiv:1903.03004 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alvioli, M.
Affiliations
Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection (IT)
Corresponding author
Alvioli, Massimiliano
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
204
Pages
103906
ISSN
0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048812303
Cited by
34
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Högskolan i Gävle
  • Università degli Studi di Perugia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
Keywords
urban area delineation, administrative boundaries, scaling laws, natural cities, human mobility, effective area, municipal boundaries, Italian municipalities, urban planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review