Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Participatory decision making for sustainable development—the use of mediated modelling techniques

Antunes, Paula, Santos, Rui, Videira, Nuno·2006·Land Use Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Akkermans, 1997, Clients’ opinions on group model building, System Dynamics Review, 13, 3, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199721)13:1<3::AID-SDR113>3.0.CO;2-I · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1727(199721)13:1<3::aid-sdr113>3.0.co;2-i
  2. van den Belt, M., Deutsch, L., Jansson, A., 1996. An integrated ecological economic assessment of the coastal zone of Patagonia: using modeling as a consensus building tool. Proceedings of the Conference Ecology, Society, Economy. In Pursuit of Sustainable Development. Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Paris.
  3. van den Belt, M., Antunes, P., Santos, R., 1997. Mediated modeling: a tool for stakeholder involvement in environmental decision making. Algarve Coastal Zone Conference, July 10–12, Faro.
  4. van den Belt, 1998, A consensus-based simulation model for management in the Patagonia coastal zone, Ecological Modeling, 110, 79, 10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00043-X · DOI
  5. Costanza, 1998, Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental models and build consensus, Environmental Management, 22, 185, 10.1007/s002679900095 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Forrester, 1987, Lessons from system dynamics modelling, System Dynamics Review, 3, 136, 10.1002/sdr.4260030205 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Funtowicz, 1994, The worth of a songbird, Ecological Economics, 10, 197, 10.1016/0921-8009(94)90108-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Funtowicz, 1997, Ciência pós-normal e comunidades ampliadas de pares face aos desafios ambientais, História, Ciências, Saúde—Manguinhos, IV, 219, 10.1590/S0104-59701997000200002 · doi:10.1590/s0104-59701997000200002
  9. Gregory, 2000, Using stakeholder values to make smarter environmental decisions, Environment, 42, 34, 10.1080/00139150009604888 · DOI
  10. Guimarães Pereira, 2002, From technocratic to participatory decision support systems, Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis (GIDA), 6, 95
  11. Messner, F., 2002. Participation in multicriteria decision support for a large-scale water allocation problem under conditions of global change in the Spree River Basin (Germany). Paper presented at the ESF/SCSS Exploratory Workshop on New Strategies for Solving Environmental Conflicts: Potentials for Combining Participation and Multicriteria Analysis. Leipzig, 26–28 June.
  12. de Montis, A., de Toro, P., Droste-Franke, B., Omann, I., Stagl, S., 2000. Criteria for quality assessment of MCDA-methods. Third Biennial Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, May 3–6.
  13. Munda, 2004, Social multi-criteria evaluation, European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 662, 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00369-2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Norese, M.F., 2002. ELECTRE III as a support for waste incineration participatory decision making. Paper presented at the ESF/SCSS Exploratory Workshop on New Strategies for Solving Environmental Conflicts: Potentials for Combining Participation and Multicriteria Analysis, Leipzig, 26–28 June.
  15. Paruccini, M. (Ed.), 1994. Applying Multi Criteria Aid for Decision to Environmental Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0767-1
  16. Richardson, 1995, Teamwork in group model building, System Dynamics Review, 11, 113, 10.1002/sdr.4260110203 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Rouwette, 2002, Group model building effectiveness, System Dynamics Review, 18, 5, 10.1002/sdr.229 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Schmoldt, 2000, Analytical group decision making in natural resources, Forest Science, 46, 62, 10.1093/forestscience/46.1.62 · DOI
  19. Stagl, S., 2003. Multicriteria evaluation and public participation: in search for theoretical foundations. Paper presented at the “Frontiers 2 Conference: European Applications of Ecological Economics”, Tenerife, Spain, 12–15 February.
  20. Stave, 2002, Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions, System Dynamics Review, 18, 139, 10.1002/sdr.237 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Vennix, 1999, Group model-building, System Dynamics Review, 15, 379, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199924)15:4<379::AID-SDR179>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI · Paper page
  22. Vennix, 1996, Group model building to facilitate organizational change, System Dynamics Review, 12, 39, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199621)12:1<39::AID-SDR94>3.0.CO;2-K · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1727(199621)12:1<39::aid-sdr94>3.0.co;2-k

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Videira, N.
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
44-52
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.014
OpenAlex
W2082981533
Cited by
193
References
1
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participatory decision making for sustainable development—the use of mediated modelling techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.014
The paper
Antunes, P., Santos, R., & Videira, N. (2006). Participatory decision making for sustainable development—the use of mediated modelling techniques. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.