Cited by 318Sustainable Finance and Green BondsSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate Change Policy and Economics

Closing the green finance gap – a systems perspective

Open access
Hafner, Sarah, Jones, Aled, Anger-Kraavi, Annela, Pohl, Jan·2020·Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.007

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 168 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hafner, S., Jones, A., Anger-Kraavi, A., & Pohl, J.
Affiliations
  • Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Hafner, Sarah
Venue
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
34
Pages
26-60
ISSN
2210-4224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990695454
Cited by
318
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 14 · 2014: 1
FWCI
27.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (publishedVersion)
  • Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Center for Urban Science and Progress
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M010163/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
energy decarbonization, investment barriers, policy uncertainty, short-termism, path dependence, lock-in, nonlinearity, systems theory, climate policy, UK energy sector

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review