Cited by 93Urban Agriculture and SustainabilityAgricultural economics and policiesOrganic Food and Agriculture

Professional urban agriculture and its characteristic business models in Metropolis Ruhr, Germany

Pölling, Bernd, Mergenthaler, Marcus, Lorleberg, Wolf·2016·Land Use Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Pölling, B., Mergenthaler, M., & Lorleberg, W.
Affiliations
South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Pölling, Bernd
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
58
Pages
366-379
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2513124833
Cited by
93
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Land Use Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
Keywords
business models, differentiation, diversification, horticulture, direct marketing, agricultural land loss, land access, urban agriculture policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review