Cited by 33Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesAgricultural Economics and PolicyAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

The promised land: contrasting frames of marginal land in the European Union

Open access
Muscat, A., de Olde, E.M., Candel, J.J.L., de Boer, I.J.M., Ripoll-Bosch, R.·2022·Land Use Policy

Abstract

Appropriating marginal land is seen as a way to overcome a wide range of land-use challenges such as food-feed-fuel competition, avoiding land abandonment, and preserving nature. As a result, there is growing interest in policy and academic communities to identify, define and measure the potential of marginal land to overcome these challenges. However, multiple definitions of marginal land exist due to the various ways of framing the problems and the solutions marginal land can address. This leads to a number of competing claims on and diverging debates about marginal land. To explore the competing claims on marginal land in these frames, we performed a framing analysis of EU policy debates about marginal land. Through this analysis, we find that different actors have conflicting ways of framing what problems marginal land can address and what courses of action to take. These frames do not overcome but form part of contested land-use debates already present in Europe. Exact definitions or estimations of marginal land are unlikely to overcome land-use debates because land-use decisions are subject to the same competing claims and hence normative decisions as land-use decisions around productive land. These marginal land frames reflect a vision for how land should be used; for food, feed, fuel or nature. We argue that exact estimations of marginal land are unlikely to fix controversies on land-use due to the inherent ambiguity of marginal land. Instead, we believe that deliberative science-policy relationships are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105860

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bioenergy can have a double impact on marginal land, energy production and feed for livestock.

    “Bioenergy can have a double impact on marginal land, energy production and feed for livestock (Helliwell, 2018;Mooney et al., 2015;Muscat et al., 2022).”

    From Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Muscat et al., 2022

  • According to the review of Muscat et al. (2022), main policies and related projects targeting marginal lands in the European Union can be framed to three major areas: sustainable bioenergy, rural development and ecosystem restoration.

    “According to the review of Muscat et al. (2022) main policies and related projects targeting marginal lands in the European Union can be framed to three major areas: sustainable bioenergy, rural development and ecosystem restoration.”

    From Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Muscat et al. (2022)

  • Bioenergy related feedstocks (e.g. corn stover, switchgrass) could be valuable supply for farms to feed livestock, so bioenergy has a double effect in rural development in marginal lands.

    “Bioenergy related feedstocks (e.g. corn stover, switchgrass) could be valuable supply for farms to feed livestock, so the bioenergy has a double effect in rural development in marginal lands (Helliwell, 2018;Mooney et al., 2015;Muscat et al., 2022).”

    From Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Muscat et al., 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. European Commission. (2000). Green Infrastructure and Rural Abandonment What is Green Green Infrastructure and Rural Abandonment Costs & benefits of Green Infrastructure in relation to Rural Abandonment. https://doi.org/10.2861/821468. · DOI
  2. FAO, 2018. Sustainable Food Systems. Concept and Framework, pp. 1-8. 〈http://www. fao.org/3/ca2079en/CA2079EN.pdf〉.
  3. MAGIC Project press release, 2019. From nova-institute.eu. Accessed 2.10.2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., Candel, J. J. L., de Boer, I. J. M., & Ripoll-Bosch, R.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Muscat, A.
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
112
Pages
105860
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3214479002
Cited by
33
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Land Use Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020 (689669)
  • European Commission
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
marginal land, policy framing, land abandonment, nature conservation, European Union policy, science-policy relationship, deliberative democracy, land use decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review