Land grabbing in the Brazilian Amazon: Stealing public land with government approval
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Carrero et al. (2022) found that over 90% of all CAR entries in the Amazon contained some form of environmental illegality.
“Carrero et al. (2022) found that over 90% of all CAR entries in the Amazon contained some form of environmental illegality.”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Carrero et al., 2022
Cites
Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., Rodrigues, H., & Alencar, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246663 · Cited by 1,133 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Carrero, G. C., Walker, R. T., Simmons, C. S., & Fearnside, P. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Carrero, Gabriel Cardoso
- Venue
- Land Use Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 120
- Pages
- 106133
- ISSN
- 0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4225284464
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Land Use Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- University of Florida
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- land grabbing, Brazilian Amazon, deforestation, protected areas, land law reform, land legalization, commodity supply chains, Amazon frontier
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review