Cited by 5Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

Talking about mindfulness: an ethnography of communication analysis of two speech communities

Stofleth, Daniel, Manusov, Valerie·2019·Language & Communication

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.langcom.2018.12.003

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Authors
Stofleth, D., & Manusov, V.
Affiliations
  • Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Stofleth, Daniel
Venue
Language & Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
67
Pages
45-54
ISSN
0271-5309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2908798693
Cited by
5
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Language & Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Keywords
mindfulness, attention, awareness, meditation, academic discourse, popular press, speech communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review