Cited by 57Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsSocial Skills and Education

The Impact of Mindfulness on Supportive Communication Skills: Three Exploratory Studies

Jones, Susanne M., Hansen, Wesley·2015·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-014-0362-7

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, S. M., & Hansen, W.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Susanne M.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2014-11-09
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
1115-1128
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2094389448
Cited by
57
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Social Skills and Education
Keywords
supportive communication, social skills, cognitive reappraisal, emotional support, empathy, affective learning outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review