Cited by 26SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Three-dose vaccination-induced immune responses protect against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2: a population-based study in Hong Kong

Open access
Zhou, Runhong, Liu, Na, Li, Xin, Peng, Qiaoli, Yiu, Cheuk-Kwan, Huang, Haode, Yang, Dawei, Du, Zhenglong +8 more·2023·The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific

Abstract

Background The ongoing outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 infections in Hong Kong, the model city of universal masking of the world, has resulted in a major public health crisis. Although the third vaccination resulted in strong boosting of neutralization antibody, vaccine efficacy and correlate of immune protection against the major circulating Omicron BA.2 remain to be investigated. Methods We investigated the vaccine efficacy against the Omicron BA.2 breakthrough infection among 470 public servants who had received different SARS-CoV-2 vaccine regimens including two-dose BNT162b2 (2 × BNT, n = 169), three-dose BNT162b2 (3 × BNT, n = 168), two-dose CoronaVac (2 × CorV, n = 34), three-dose CoronaVac (3 × CorV, n = 67) and third-dose BNT162b2 following 2 × CorV (2 × CorV+1BNT, n = 32). Humoral and cellular immune responses after three-dose vaccination were further characterized and correlated with clinical characteristics of BA.2 infection. Findings During the BA.2 outbreak, 27.7% vaccinees were infected. The timely third-dose vaccination provided significant protection with lower incidence rates of breakthrough infections (2 × BNT 46.2% vs 3 × BNT 13.1%, p < 0.0001; 2 × CorV 44.1% vs 3 × CorV 19.4%, p = 0.003). Investigation of immune responses on blood samples derived from 90 subjects in three-dose vaccination cohorts collected before the BA.2 outbreak revealed that the third-dose vaccination activated spike (S)-specific memory B cells and Omicron cross-reactive T cell responses, which correlated with reduced frequencies of breakthrough infections and disease severity rather than with types of vaccines. Moreover, the frequency of S-specific activated memory B cells was significantly lower in infected vaccinees than uninfected vaccinees before vaccine-breakthrough infection whereas IFN-γ + CD4 T cells were negatively associated with age and viral clearance time. Critically, BA.2 breakthrough infection boosted cross-reactive memory B cells with enhanced cross-neutralizing antibodies to Omicron sublineages, including BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5, in all vaccinees tested. Interpretation Our results imply that the timely third vaccination and immune responses are likely required for vaccine-mediated protection against Omicron BA.2 pandemic. Although BA.2 conferred the highest neutralization resistance compared with variants of concern tested before the emergence of BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5, the third dose vaccination-activated S-specific memory B cells and Omicron cross-reactive T cell responses contributed to reduced frequencies of breakthrough infection and disease severity. Neutralizing antibody potency enhanced by BA.2 breakthrough infection in vaccinees with prior 3 doses of CoronaVac or BNT162b2 may reduce the risk of infection against ongoing BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5. Funding Hong Kong Research Grants Council Collaborative Research Fund, Health and Medical Research Fund, Wellcome Trust, Shenzhen Science and Technology Program, the Health@InnoHK, Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong, China, National Program on Key Research Project, Emergency Key Program of Guangzhou Laboratory, donations from the Friends of Hope Education Fund and the Hong Kong Theme-Based Research Scheme.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100660

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difference in neutralization between BA.1 and BA.4/5 is substantially less than the difference in neutralization observed between BA.1 and previous variants of concern (Alpha and Delta).

    “Of note, this difference in neutralization between BA.1 and BA.4/5 is substantially less than the difference in neutralization that was observed between BA.1 and previous variants of concern (e.g., Alpha and Delta) [19,20].”

    From Assessing COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against Omicron subvariants: Report from a meeting of the World Health Organization (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results section on neutralizing-antibody breadth reports that resistance generally increased from Alpha and Delta to Omicron lineages, and that BA.4/5 was more resistant than other variants. It does not establish that the BA.1–BA.4/5 neutralization difference was substantially smaller than the BA.1–Alpha or BA.1–Delta differences. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. [3]Voysey M. Clemens S.A.C. Madhi S.A. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK Lancet 397 10269 2021 99 111 33306989 PMC7723445
  2. [5]Xia S. Zhang Y. Wang Y. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial Lancet Infect Dis 21 1 2021 39 51 33069281 PMC7561304
  3. [7]Peng Q. Zhou R. Wang Y. Waning immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern among vaccinees in Hong Kong EBioMedicine 77 2022 103904 PMC8893246 35248996
  4. [9]Cheng S.M.S. Mok C.K.P. Leung Y.W.Y. Neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant BA.1 following homologous and heterologous CoronaVac or BNT162b2 vaccination Nat Med 28 2022 486 489 35051989 PMC8940714
  5. [10]Cheng V.C. Ip J.D. Chu A.W. Rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2 in a single-source community outbreak Clin Infect Dis 2022 10.1093/cid/ciac203 PMC8992238 35271728 · DOI
  6. [11]Zhou R. To K.K. Wong Y.C. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs dendritic cell and T cell responses Immunity 53 4 2020 864 877.e5 32791036 PMC7402670
  7. [12]Sette A. Crotty S. Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Cell 184 4 2021 861 880 33497610 PMC7803150
  8. [14]Mefsin Y.M. Chen D. Bond H.S. Epidemiology of infections with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant, Hong Kong, January-March 2022 Emerg Infect Dis 28 9 2022 1856 1858 35914518 PMC9423929
  9. [16]Haagmans B.L. Noack D. Okba N.M.A. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing human antibodies protect against lower respiratory tract disease in a hamster model J Infect Dis 223 12 2021 2020 2028 34043806 PMC8243397
  10. [17]Zhou R. To K.K. Peng Q. Vaccine-breakthrough infection by the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant elicits broadly cross-reactive immune responses Clin Transl Med 12 1 2022 e720 PMC8792449 35083867
  11. [18]Le Bert N. Tan A.T. Kunasegaran K. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls Nature 584 7821 2020 457 462 32668444
  12. [19]Juno J.A. Tan H.X. Lee W.S. Humoral and circulating follicular helper T cell responses in recovered patients with COVID-19 Nat Med 26 9 2020 1428 1434 32661393
  13. [20]Yu J. Collier A.Y. Rowe M. Neutralization of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants N Engl J Med 386 16 2022 1579 1580 35294809 PMC9006770
  14. [21]Suntronwong N. Yorsaeng R. Puenpa J. COVID-19 breakthrough infection after inactivated vaccine induced robust antibody responses and cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants, but less immunity against Omicron Vaccines (Basel) 10 3 2022 391 35335023 PMC8949546
  15. [22]Koutsakos M. Lee W.S. Reynaldi A. The magnitude and timing of recalled immunity after breakthrough infection is shaped by SARS-CoV-2 variants Immunity 55 7 2022 1316 13126.e4 35690062 PMC9135796
  16. [24]Walls A.C. Sprouse K.R. Bowen J.E. SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections elicit potent, broad, and durable neutralizing antibody responses Cell 185 5 2022 872 880.e3 35123650 PMC8769922
  17. [25]Accorsi E.K. Britton A. Fleming-Dutra K.E. Association between 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and symptomatic infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and delta variants JAMA 327 7 2022 639 651 35060999 PMC8848203
  18. [26]Zeng G. Wu Q. Pan H. Immunogenicity and safety of a third dose of CoronaVac, and immune persistence of a two-dose schedule, in healthy adults: interim results from two single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trials Lancet Infect Dis 22 2021 483 495 34890537 PMC8651254
  19. [27]Moghnieh R. Mekdashi R. El-Hassan S. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 booster in BBIBP-CorV-vaccinated individuals compared with homologous BNT162b2 vaccination: results of a pilot prospective cohort study from Lebanon Vaccine 39 46 2021 6713 6719 34656379 PMC8513356
  20. [28]Costa Clemens S.A. Weckx L. Clemens R. Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study Lancet 399 10324 2022 521 529 35074136 PMC8782575
  21. [29]Cerqueira-Silva T. Katikireddi S.V. de Araujo Oliveira V. Vaccine effectiveness of heterologous CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 in Brazil Nat Med 28 2022 838 843 35140406 PMC9018414
  22. [30]Menni C. Valdes A.M. Polidori L. Symptom prevalence, duration, and risk of hospital admission in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during periods of omicron and delta variant dominance: a prospective observational study from the ZOE COVID Study Lancet 399 2022 1618 1624 35397851 PMC8989396
  23. [31]Kim M.K. Lee B. Choi Y.Y. Clinical characteristics of 40 patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in korea J Korean Med Sci 37 3 2022 e31 35040299 PMC8763884
  24. [32]Wolter N. Jassat W. Walaza S. Early assessment of the clinical severity of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant in South Africa: a data linkage study Lancet 399 10323 2022 437 446 35065011 PMC8769664
  25. [33]Maslo C. Friedland R. Toubkin M. Laubscher A. Akaloo T. Kama B. Characteristics and Outcomes of hospitalized patients in South Africa during the COVID-19 Omicron wave compared with previous waves JAMA 327 6 2022 583 584 34967859 PMC8719272
  26. [34]Jassat W. Abdool Karim S.S. Mudara C. Clinical severity of COVID-19 patients admitted to hospitals during the Omicron wave in South Africa medRxiv 2022 38 42 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.357 PMC9116895 35597249 · DOI
  27. [35]Houhamdi L. Gautret P. Hoang V.T. Fournier P.E. Colson P. Raoult D. Characteristics of the first 1119 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant cases, in marseille, France, November-December 2021 J Med Virol 94 5 2022 2290 2295 35060146 PMC9015264
  28. [36]Yoon S.K. Hegmann K.T. Thiese M.S. Protection with a third dose of mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variants in frontline workers N Engl J Med 2022 10.1056/NEJMc2201821 PMC9006784 35385628 · DOI
  29. [37]Thompson M.G. Natarajan K. Irving S.A. Effectiveness of a third dose of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19-associated emergency department and urgent care encounters and hospitalizations among adults during periods of delta and Omicron variant predominance - VISION network, 10 states MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 71 4 August 2021-January 2022 139 145 PMC9351525 35085224
  30. [39]Iketani Sho Liu Lihong Guo Yicheng Antibody evasion properties of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages Nature 604 2022 553 556 35240676 PMC9021018
  31. [40]Yamasoba D. Kimura I. Nasser H. Virological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2 variant bioRxiv 2022 1540 1555 10.1016/j.chom.2022.10.003 PMC9578327 36272413 · DOI
  32. [41]Lyngse F.P. Kirkeby C.T. Denwood M. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron VOC subvariants BA.1 and BA.2: evidence from Danish households medRxiv 2022 2022.01.28.22270044 PMC9524324 36180438
  33. [42]Zhou D. Chan J.F. Zhou B. Robust SARS-CoV-2 infection in nasal turbinates after treatment with systemic neutralizing antibodies Cell Host Microbe 29 4 2021 551 563.e5 33657424 PMC7904446
  34. [43]Hui K.P.Y. Ho J.C.W. Cheung M.C. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant replication in human bronchus and lung ex vivo Nature 603 7902 2022 715 720 35104836
  35. [44]Hui K.P.Y. Ng K.C. Ho J.C.W. Replication of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant in ex vivo cultures of the human upper and lower respiratory tract EBioMedicine 83 2022 104232 PMC9387351 35988466
  36. [45]Shuai H. Chan J.F. Hu B. Attenuated replication and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron Nature 603 7902 2022 693 699 35062016
  37. [46]McMenamin M.E. Nealon J. Lin Y. Vaccine effectiveness of one, two, and three doses of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac against COVID-19 in Hong Kong: a population-based observational study Lancet Infect Dis 22 10 2022 1435 1443 35850128 PMC9286709
  38. [47]Yan V.K.C.B. Wan E.Y.F.P. Ye X.M. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccinations against mortality and severe complications after SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 infection: a case-control study Emerg Microbes Infect 2022 1 48 PMC9553171 35980089
  39. [48]Lau D. Lan L.Y. Andrews S.F. Low CD21 expression defines a population of recent germinal center graduates primed for plasma cell differentiation Sci Immunol 2 7 2017 eaai8153 PMC5896567 28783670
  40. [50]Scully C. Georgakopoulou E.A. Hassona Y. The immune system: basis of so much health and disease: 3. Adaptive immunity Dent Update 44 4 2017 322-4, 327 29172358
  41. [51]Gao Y. Cai C. Grifoni A. Ancestral SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells cross-recognize the Omicron variant Nat Med 28 2022 472 476 35042228 PMC8938268
  42. [52]Keeton R. Tincho M.B. Ngomti A. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike cross-recognize Omicron Nature 603 7901 2022 488 492 35102311 PMC8930768
  43. [53]Wang Q. Guo Y. Iketani S. Antibody evasion by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 Nature 608 7923 2022 603 608 35790190 PMC9385487
  44. [54]Cao Y. Yisimayi A. Jian F. BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection Nature 608 7923 2022 593 602 35714668 PMC9385493
  45. [55]Tuekprakhon A. Nutalai R. Dijokaite-Guraliuc A. Antibody escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 from vaccine and BA.1 serum Cell 185 14 2022 2422 2433.e13 35772405 PMC9181312
  46. [56]Malato J. Ribeiro R.M. Leite P.P. Risk of BA.5 infection among persons exposed to previous SARS-CoV-2 variants N Engl J Med 387 2022 953 954 36044619 PMC9454644
  47. [57]Kaku C.I. Bergeron A.J. Ahlm C. Recall of preexisting cross-reactive B cell memory after Omicron BA.1 breakthrough infection Sci Immunol 7 73 2022 eabq3511 PMC9097882 35549299
  48. [58]Quandt J. Muik A. Salisch N. Omicron BA.1 breakthrough infection drives cross-variant neutralization and memory B cell formation against conserved epitopes Sci Immunol 2022 eabq2427 PMC9162083 35653438
  49. [59]van Zelm M.C. Immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 breakthrough infections: to change the vaccine or not? Sci Immunol 7 74 2022 eabq5901 35653497
  50. [60]Chu L. Vrbicky K. Montefiori D. Immune response to SARS-CoV-2 after a booster of mRNA-1273: an open-label phase 2 trial Nat Med 28 5 2022 1042 1049 35241844 PMC9117133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, R., Liu, N., Li, X., Peng, Q., Yiu, C.-K., Huang, H., Yang, D., Du, Z., Kwok, H.-Y., Au, K.-K., Cai, J.-P., Fan-Ngai Hung, I., Kai-Wang To, K., Xu, X., Yuen, K.-Y., & Chen, Z.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HK)
  • University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital (CN)
  • Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Runhong
  • Chen, Zhiwei
Venue
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
32
Pages
100660
ISSN
2666-6065 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312109325
Cited by
26
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (T11-706/18-N)
  • Health and Medical Research Fund (19181012, COVID190123, COVID1903010)
  • Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (JCYJ20210324131610027, JSGG20200225151410198)
  • Wellcome Trust (P86433)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2, breakthrough infection, third dose vaccination, BNT162b2, CoronaVac, vaccine efficacy, neutralizing antibodies, disease severity, universal masking, viral clearance time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review