Multi-level nature of and multi-level approaches to leadership
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional leadership is a multi-level phenomenon involving interactions between an individual leader and multiple followers working in the same group, which, along with other work groups, is embedded within an organization.
“By its nature, traditional leadership is a multi-level phenomenon involving interactions between an individual leader and multiple followers working in the same group, which, along with other work groups, is embedded within an organization (Yammarino & Dansereau, 2008).”
From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Yammarino & Dansereau, 2008
A fundamental consensus among leadership scholars is that theory building and testing must maintain consistency in levels of analysis.
“A fundamental consensus among leadership scholars is that the theory building (i.e., hypotheses, frameworks, or models) and testing (i.e., measurement, data analysis, and inference drawing) must maintain consistency in terms of levels of analysis (e.g., Schriesheim et al., 2001; Yammarino et al., 2005; Yammarino & Dansereau, 2008).”
From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Yammarino & Dansereau, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review
Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective
Liao, C. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions
Liden, R. C., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115036 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yammarino, F. J., & Dansereau, F.
- Affiliations
- Binghamton University (US)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yammarino, Francis J.
- Venue
- The Leadership Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-141
- ISSN
- 1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025136248
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 18.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
- Keywords
- multilevel leadership, levels of analysis, leadership research, multilevel analysis, leadership theory, leadership assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
