CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 439Gender Diversity and InequalityGender Politics and RepresentationMedia, Gender, and Advertising

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact

Open access
Ryan, Michelle K., Haslam, S. Alexander, Morgenroth, Thekla, Rink, Floor, Stoker, Janka, Peters, Kim·2016·The Leadership Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.008

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hennessey, 2013, Is there a” glass cliff?” examining the phenomenon using board of director appointments in Canada, Academy of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict, 9
  2. Judge, 2003, Women on board: Help or hindrance?, The Times, p., 21
  3. Morgenroth, T., & Wegge, J. (2015). Signaling change: What companies hope to gain from appointing women to glass cliff positions. Unpublished diploma thesis, Technical University Dresden, Germany.
  4. Silva, 2012, Good intentions, imperfect execution: Women get fewer of the “hot jobs” needed to advance, Catalyst, 15-17
  5. Woods, 2004, Are female execs walking into trouble?, The Daily Telegraph, 23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–439 of 439

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., & Peters, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Ryan, Michelle K.
ORCID
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
446-455
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.008
OpenAlex
W2282655057
Cited by
439
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4
FWCI
65.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Social Fund (4130)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (062 23 0135)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
glass cliff, women in leadership, gender and leadership, leadership appointments, moderators, gender stereotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review